

No means no!
Such a freaking epic stand against the forces of phone modification


No means no!
Such a freaking epic stand against the forces of phone modification


Then, by running those interactions through a pretrained convolutional neural network—a system that uses deep learning to analyze text, audio, and images—the attacker can deduce various apps and websites open on the device.
This smells like total bullshit. I’m not going to read the paper, but another part of this article seems to identify latency as the sole inputs. If it were really so groundbreaking then where’s the demo I can run myself?
Was this a newly registered domain? I’m curious if using something older will let me skip most the spam bullshit, or if I’d have to just deal with asking people to click “not spam” first


Anything still broken after updating again is actually unnecessary bloat, or else it wouldn’t still be broken
My trust in them was definitely shaken after the recent news about fingerprinting exit IPs: https://tmctmt.com/posts/mullvad-exit-ips-as-a-fingerprinting-vector/
They were very responsive but this seemed like a huge fuck-up to me, to the extent that I question whether it was purposeful.
Not sure who else to trust because other providers like Proton seem even worse