

If we are pedantic, I’m not sure if “children cannot consent” is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them.
If we are pedantic, I’m not sure if “children cannot consent” is correct. Children at 16 are mature enough to give consent in legal context, we as a society just frown upon older adults mingling with them.
You’re the first person ever that was able to explain to me the difference and make me yearn for it.
I never considered it a democracy. It’s one-party system with two parties, what can be democratic about it? Smoke and mirrors.
My point is that the polls mentioned in the wiki seem to not be mentioning socio-economic systems, but the USSR country and it’s culture, as well as it’s dissolution (which was handled like shit in most of the countries AFAIK).
ex-Soviet citizens prefer Socialism.
That’s not exactly what the polls in the article were about though?
The article seems to be missing polling history from countries that don’t support it’s thesis, like Poland.
You might want to check out wikipedia.
That’s literally alternative medicine defined as per well, science. And you being silly doesn’t take from it. In the past, viruses were considered alternative medicine (quackery even), until they were proven to exist and work as in theory.
If you hit someone with a stick and that person gets cured of cold, it’s alternative medicine (you suspect there’s correlation or causation, and repeating the treatment during other incidents tends to have similar effect, i.e. when you hit more people they also get cured). When it’s proven that there’s causation between your action and the cure, then it’s medicine.
I’m not sure what are you trying to tell me.
That you agree with me that “alternative medicine = not proven to work, but I’m wrong somehow”?
That wiki article is very biased.
It also has problems distinguishing pseudo medicine (proven not to work) from alternative medicine (not conclusively proved or disproved).
same people would argue static typing is better then dynamic typing
I mean… It depends. But in my work (buy side finance) - duh.
Before the internet insane people were left to paint with chalk on the streets… And now this.
If you were to say what you just did in Poland on the street, you’d get lynched.
I have access to the same information as you, so unfortunately, I don’t know.
The article literally says you will still be able to push books via Calibre etc, but won’t be able to download books into Kindle from PC.
Example: If you don’t have a WiFi at home, there is an option to connect Kindle via USB to your ethernet connected PC and download books from Amazon that way.
And this option is going away, as most people have WiFi.
Anywho, fuck Amazon (for other things, but not this one).
People who has been maintaining the kernel and weathered multiple fads are wary to see if new guards will “stick”, or just stay along for a year or five, disappear and leave the old guard with shit.
From another study with N=700:
We measured self-reported meat consumption, meat disgust (by self-report and Implicit Association Test),
IAT is phrenology of social studies. You can discard it as garbage. If a study is using IAT as methodology, it’s garbage done to gain some publication points.
You can read more about IAT: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000778
Of the 40 participants, 28 reported an increase in meat disgust.
A study on a group of 40 is an anecdote at best, a waste of resources at worst.
Reporting on it in on a big news website should be a crime, as it’s just a clickbait.
The “royal we” means you, not you and us.
I am surprised that you read my post as against building state owned apartment complex, but then why would I expect anything from somone on the internet.
Close but no cigar. It’s also about collecting as little data as possible. Company can be sued or fined if a data collection is deemed excessive.