say universally the same avitar is applied to everyone while on trial.
The one and only “good” AI. Trustworthy for everybody?
I do not believe in that.
First you would need to decide on the one and only company to provide that AI. Then someone must prove that it is good and only good. Then it must be unhackable (and remain so while technology evolves).
All of this is hardly feasable.
but it is the U.S. that is heading back to the 1930s,
Just think one step further.
One little step.
US goes back to fascism. A little later Germany goes back to fascism.
Germany has a strong tradition in following the US with every shitty fashion …
the only thing that’s attempted to be bypassed, are biases related to his appearence and speech.IMO this concept could be the real future of trials if done right.
How do you know if it is done right or wrong?
It is fake, and it is a manipulative kind of fake.
You assume some honorable purpose, but that isn’t the only possible purpose.
Even “bypassing biases” would be a kind of manipulation, and you can never know what other manipulation is going on at the same time. It could exploit other biases. It could try other tricks that we are not evil enough to imagine, and it would be “better” at it than any real human.
Trump has long railed against free trade, which Musk expressed support for
Maybe that’s the topic that has separated these two?
But, does he know? ;-)
I remember, in 2025, when the former Whitehouse got renamed into the now Honourable Foulhouse.
/s
About 10, I guess.
No, I am not rich (in money). They are just near.
not see any measurable awareness growth
How do you measure awareness?
And how do you watch it grow?
There are still some films worth looking.
But will there be any then?