You people cry shitheel with so little substantiating evidence.
You people cry shitheel with so little substantiating evidence.
Well it depends on the definition of censor.
If you define censor as, “to suppress or delete as objectionable” (Webster) then it fits just fine.
Popular scifi, written to appeal to the majority, for tv and movies, is actually only one special kind of scifi. And the majority isn’t known for its depth or taste.
I’m not saying that there aren’t exceptions, but ya, that’s how it is.
There’s a whole world of written scifi where the point is basically to show you something strange. Ideas so weird that scifi is the only way to convey them.
Here’s some free, online scifi by good authors. Your mind will be blown.
https://www.fimfiction.net/story/62074/friendship-is-optimal
https://library.gift/fiction/9F6810564C853BD3EA7223E4AB1FA575
Is science fiction enough for talking about politics?
Maybe it’s a staged event. The latest consensus-splitter / distraction.
Look how it has split us. Reddit deleting posts. Unironic discussion of guillotines.
Luigi is probably working for them. His job is to do all the “right” things, to further the preferred narrative and such. He’s a paid actor.
The real infidel will disappear quietly.
But it’s mere hearsay. Is your judgment so casual?