Guardian have a paywall for their mobile app, you get a quota of articles per week.

However the website which is almost identical is unlimited

I just mail my vote, mail comes in fill in form and mail goes out.

It takes 5mins out of my day tops

That sounds sweet, I’ll consider Fairphone once my current android dies its not so noble death

In fairness the removable battery came with a pretty significant tradeoff.

Water resistance.

Many would happily take a reduction in water resistance for replaceable batteries, the problem is no one gives us the choice

EDIT: inaccurate statement. Fairphone offers removable batteries

Late stage capitalism

The problem is AI will always confidently give you an answer like its word is fact. Obviously since you’re the one searching, you’re most likely unable to verify its accuracy so it’s impossible to trust.

I dont mind AI being wrong when i can immediately tell when its wrong but in searches I’ll never trust it

Although his opinion is unpopular and you may have not of heard of it, that fact has precisely zero to do with its truthfulness and validity

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses” - Henry Ford

Current citty dweller here, having 200 people within 30m (in three dimensions) of my bed at night is unsustainable. Trust me theres a middleground somewhere

Mobile youtube links, gross

Unless you are watching live content, you are correct

The downvotes on your comments are only proving your point. People want others to reform but not themselves

The only valid excuse for not changing your lifestyle is if you cant afford to.

Brash statement.

Some countries/areas offer options to avoid buying the vast majority of plastics. The problem is that its almost always more expensive to purchase the plastic free alternative.

When money is involved its pretty obvious what happens and what people pick

Im afraid to ask, but whats wrong with that line? In the right context thats fine to do no?

Yeah tbh it’s a problem of mine, I expect too much from the average user.

thanks for grounding me

I completely agree, i live in a city where i can get everything within 15-20min walk. But unfortunately there are about 50-100 people within 25m of my living room at all times and i would rather have some space

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here. Unless youre in an exceptionally denly populated area, people dont travel this close to one another. Most leave at least 1-2 humans gap between eachother, especially if there are wheelchairs, kids and prams involved.

Thats all my argument was, the cars are spaced out per lane (albiet bumper to bumper) but the side to side space is not consistent with the walkers. You could fit cars in between the cars with how they are spaced in that pic. I live in a victorian town where the roads force you to drive wingmirror to wingmirror

Im on the fuckcars space here, trust me I agree cars need to be phased out/down but thats no excuse for bias in data

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here. Unless youre in an exceptionally denly populated area, people dont travel this close to one another. Most leave at least 1-2 humans gap between eachother, especially if there are wheelchairs, kids and prams involved.

Thats all my argument was, the cars are spaced out per lane (albiet bumper to bumper) but the side to side space is not consistent with the walkers. You could fit cars in between the cars with how they are spaced in that pic. I live in a victorian town where the roads force you to drive wingmirror to wingmirror

Im on the fuckcars space here, trust me I agree cars need to be phased out/down but thats no excuse for bias in data

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here. Unless youre in an exceptionally denly populated area, people dont travel this close to one another. Most leave at least 1-2 humans gap between eachother, especially if there are wheelchairs, kids and prams involved.

Thats all my argument was, the cars are spaced out per lane (albiet bumper to bumper) but the side to side space is not consistent with the walkers. You could fit cars in between the cars with how they are spaced in that pic. I live in a victorian town where the roads force you to drive wingmirror to wingmirror

Im on the fuckcars space here, trust me I agree cars need to be phased out/down but thats no excuse for bias in data

Why are the cars spaced but the walking humans not?

That’ll be us when we’re old, in-charge and stuck in our 2020 ways