- 51 Posts
- 77 Comments
thx for this, i love it
i think thats the 135mm focal length combined with a f2 aperture and an adapter acting a bit like a macro extender
Yes, or it was, now its just the front shell with some copper tape on it
doin this every day
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto pics@lemmy.world•This was a triumph. I′m making a note here "Huge success"7·8 天前I am not even angry 😌
Dust particles on my camera sensor after a lens change^^
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•I'll have two number 9s, a Big Rip large, a number 6 with extra dip, a Big Freeze, two Big Crunchs, one with cheese, and a Big Slurp.English3·26 天前bruh thats the Albanian Scientist from “The Manchurian Candidate” movie
this is good for the 11m CB radio people
This is in fact correct, down to the frog in the pond even… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5Nbc24hVHE 6:43
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Shit like this is why we need open source printers!English2·2 个月前Those problems still sound more easy to fix than building custom mems Inkjet nozzles at home. Lasers in all sorts of wavelengths can be bought. Putting charge on the toner is just a question of adding some high voltage. The dielectric photosensitive material on the toner transfer drum, yeah that may require some research.
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Shit like this is why we need open source printers!English6·2 个月前That’s a plotter, and opensource plotters do already exist. Problem with em is that they lack speed and precision to print small text.
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Shit like this is why we need open source printers!English5·2 个月前Plotters are problematic, due to them beeing very very slow and that everthing they print has to be converted into a vector first.
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Shit like this is why we need open source printers!English5·2 个月前I remember that video! For sure worth a watch
einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Shit like this is why we need open source printers!English18·2 个月前Yeah inkjet printers will probably never be opensource, due to the fact that the tiny nozzles are impossible to produce without owning a semiconductor fab that can build stuff in the mems realm.
Laser printers could be the way to go, they sound more complicated, but all the components needed for them are getting cheaper. A laser is focusable to a tiny spot, meaning one can use non mems elements. Basically take a laser engraver (the type with the fixed laser head and those 2 spinning mirrors), point it at a high voltage drum, lase the pattern (removes the charge from parts of the drum), add the toner power and then roll over paper. For color just replicate that x3.
I think a Opensource Black/White laser printer should be possible at a price point of maybe 600$ in components (3d printers also started out at that price point then got cheaper). I doubt it would be as quick as commercial models but it should be doable.
wiggle gif, very nice!