Funded by / Ownership
The Anti-Defamation League is a nonprofit that is funded through donations. They do not disclose donors.
Weird, usually that knocks down organizations. Amazing how it’s fine here
Funded by / Ownership
The Anti-Defamation League is a nonprofit that is funded through donations. They do not disclose donors.
Weird, usually that knocks down organizations. Amazing how it’s fine here
What’s signal doing now?
Why are they integrating unrwa workers???
Treating others like a child and being a pedantic asshole will usually get you that response.
It’s amazing how many words you use to also say nothing
Fuck off back to reddit
A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact[27]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that “While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire,” and stating that “Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific.”[6] Also in 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as “an armchair media analysis”[28] and characterized their assessments as “subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in”.[29] A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: “While [Media Bias/Fact Check’s] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems.”[19]
I’m trying to summarize the wiki reasoning/what’s in the wiki page about mbfc criticisms
They’re saying the parts mbfc uses other data from is fine, like the fact checking matching others as they all use the same source. But the rest like bias can’t be trusted as it’s just their own unscientific methods.
Better places to find planes lol
And nothing of value was lost
Yeah but they totally don’t let their bias influence their decisions to make it that way…the teams for it
Or Microsoft kills the work around to get non supported cpus running win 11
I like how you are arguing against their own wording of the state of the game from the Devs.
I just want the fucking game I kickstarted but have given up on ever having it delivered. Of course to you that just means i’m a generic “hater”.
Aaron Bandler is an investigative journalist for the Jewish Journal. Originally from the Bay Area, his past work experience includes writing for The Daily Wire, The Daily Caller and Townhall.
I mean if that’s the journalist…
Usually means almost ready for release not many years away.
Hell even in their own words it’s just around the corner.
As we move into the polishing phase, we’re fully focused on optimizing and fine-tuning all aspects of the gameplay experience to deliver an unprecedented cinematic adventure
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/19453-Squadron-42-I-Held-The-Line
So they’ve been telling us it is done and just needs polish/finishing touches. If that’s the case it is odd they’d need sudden forced overtime for a simple demo…
Technically, you’re correct despite the down votes, Hamas was the government and the HM was part of the government.
Because they’re a known hasbarist and the hamas association is only used to make it seem false.
They were considered trustworthy before as well but that didn’t stop Israel from calling it false as it made them look bad.
Sadly don’t see anything stopping the hasbarist from continuing to call anything false
Because of all the shit supplied by USA and diplomatic cover granted
What sources? You haven’t provided any