zing! You said the fascism word, and you made it “clever”!

Should have run Tulsi Gabbard.

I’m sure the response would have been identical though, given this is about sex and not Kamala Harris’s appeal as a candidate.

So “men hate women” huh? Is this something she believes of all men? I wonder what her response to an entire sex hating another entire sex is. I wonder if that belief of her colors all her interpretations of all men.

They’re vile

I see you’ve taken the snake whose only demand is freedom and recast it as a fascist.

Any reprehensible behavior — for example “no mercy” — is justified as long as there’s a fascist around right?

You guys worship violence and power. You use art to frame your crusade as moral, to authorize yourself for the enacting of evil.

He looks exactly like he sounds.

Do you have evidence of this mass banning wave you’re referring to?

Any day now, Elon Musk’s X, formerly Twitter, will go down in flames. This will prove once and for all that Elon Musk is worthy of derision!

Did Trump “target” entities for cancellation during his first presidency?

Don’t vote for the party that skipped their last election!

Steve Jobs roided

It was worth checking out. I would have been curious.

I mean why think it won’t work.

It doesn’t make any difference what got us here in the first place. What matters now is what options are the best from now moving forward.

These scientists seem to say that trying to reverse climate change isn’t the right path forward. I wonder why.

edit: I wonder what makes them think that reversing climate change won’t work.

Someone was so offended by their misreading of my comment that they went through and downvote-bombed every comment in my history.

Notice how it’s the guy in the jacket saying everything.

The one person who doesn’t just hang out, but gives a little micro sermon on how hanging out is wonderful, is the one who wants the group to be a cult.

What exactly is “good faith commerce”?

That doesn’t seem to register as a coherent concept, considering good faith has to do with considering the whole of the interaction instead of one’s own side, and business is when each person handles only their own side of the equation.

Seems like an empty phrase to me, unless you can enlighten me.

You know what the difference between a near monopoly and an actual monopoly is?

In one scenario there’s competition and in the other one there’s not. Basically one’s a monopoly and the other isn’t.

Accounting is a relationship. When the government prevents a specific type of relationship — one consenting adults are regularly choosing to enter — the result is a change in relationships.

What are you saying is a lie? What claim exactly?

Yes you signed a contract. That contract has a certain value to it, and that value offsets the cost to them of the phone.

On your side, the fact that this contract came with a subsidized phone made it worth it to you.

What the carriers are saying is that this set of interrelated contracts won’t be available, and so these terms won’t be worthwhile to the parties involved, leading to a change in future contracts. Namely, the service contracts will have to be more expensive to them, which will make them less valuable to you, which will make them less likely to happen.