I love this dude’s channel. He covers all sorts of old tech, often obscure stuff.

Also, I love that one of my favorite obscure creators shows up in my feed on my favorite obscure social network. Lemmy is my people. ❤️

Oh you’re lucky. My wife and I got the “jungle theme” room in a similar establishment in Massachusetts. Our neighbors loved the place. We could hear them loving it the whole night.

Lemmy needs awards, man! Thanks for doing the legwork for me. Now I just need to resist the urge to spend the rest of my evening reading through all of that myself lol.

Having things be unprovable in a body of models would make it not a 100% correct body of models. You know it’d be… incomplete. That’s what it means, we’ve mathematically proven you cannot prove everything that is true.

NFLS is about whether a particular claim is testable, and can therefore productively be debated (as in I’m not debating whether there is a teapot orbiting earth). The way you’ve attempted to combine these two ideas is odd.

And by Godel’s Incompleteness theorems, that body of models can never be 100% correct.

This was my first thought, we aren’t going to develop the whole world. That’s not how this works. Who said that was a goal of… well … anyone’s?

That’s a rhetorical question. Frfr tho, does that remind me work on your instance only, or what’s the deal with that?

I’m gonna hazard a guess that you are right about the trend, give or take on the time. However, there will be someone that claims some authority on what is and isn’t accurate.

Its been the job of journalists up until now, but this how they’ll finally supplant all of news media with their own (a golden Trump head of truth next to the post means grok has looked it over and says its real).

That or an open-source tool will be developed to detect ai media, and we are able to run it locally to confirm. This is my preferred outcome. Maybe I need to start doing some reading.

I think where we may differ in opinion is where the power lies in this situation. To me, it’s all about having the money for the compute, which means its propaganda for the wealthy. That’s nothing new. I do not expect a significant increase in societal support for these types of messages. At least not on a historical scale.

You seem to imply the LLM can at the very least have an emergent agenda, or seeming agenda, of its own. I do not believe that to be the case. LLMs that generate output that doesn’t align with the monied interests will be considered misaligned and discarded.

You’re missing my point. An LLM can’t be “smarter” or “smart” at all. It isn’t sentient or conscious. It doesn’t even have a stable internal model of the world. What people call “hallucinations” are simply the random words selected at the edges of its convincing predictive power. Personification of LLMs is all marketing. They’re really just well presented statistical models.

Where are these AGI systems? All I hear about is LLMs fooling execs, which is basically them just falling for a fast talking computer.

I’m right there with you. My luck came a bit later in life, so I had 10 working years of income tax actually paid close to 0% as I made little and had huge student loan debt from an attempt to get a degree.

I finished the degree and 10 yrs into a well compensated career and I’ll gladly pay thousands to the government. The wealthy people that complain about paying their share have zero perspective. They’re basically spoiled brats.

I’ve also lived in a state with lower taxes, and now one with higher taxes. You get what you pay for. I hear people everywhere complain about the roads where they live. Not everyone has had to replace whole wheels due to the stuff that some places are calling roads. Again, zero perspective if you don’t get out and see the world at least a little.

It’ll be possible. Whether someone will take the time and cost on are another question altogether.

If you do, make sure you build in a note taking/comment feature so they can track how its changed from what you’ve documented.

Good lord…

I want to hang it on my wall…

Well, I can think at least 1…

Oof. We all know this is true in our bones.

The language or the game?

I remember watching this pro legalize it documentary years ago. Man they followed the most was a medical dispensary owner. He was an mildly autistic white guy (similar to my son, high functioning) with some serious cornrows, and wore over the top brightly colored baggy clothes.

The part I remember is him rushing to go speak in front of a large group of people on the topic of legalization. He had to make a quick stop at his business, even though it wasnt usual business hours, so he could get an edible to take before he spoke.

What a korny joke…

Whats so bad about linux folk?