Alternatively start with a pipeline.

This is too close to true with the USDA word ban it’s painful.

Your suggestion to fight “doomerism” is going to appear as a continuation of that and break any remaining trust even further.

Doormerism is an issue, especially when it comes from adults who don’t know how to help. This is trauma, and this is one tool to tackle that trauma. I’m not saying we tell kids “hey cheer up that should fix it” - I’m saying we use hope as a tool to fight cynical defeatism. Which, I would submit, is all your comment achieves. Do you have an alternative?

So, their front-facing research sharing will disappear as well as any content that was exclusive to it. More immediately concerning, part of their internal network is going dark. When does this start to effect weather modeling then? Because the private sector very much relies on NOAA for its forecasts, they surely don’t want this either, not that it would stop them but still.

“For a Silent Spring” whoever came up with that tagline, I see you, and you get an imaginary raise.

Doomerism abounds for all ages, but it is certainly most harmful for our young people. Solarpunk could be an awesome tool here - giving them tools to envision a future where solutions are realistic and actionable can be very therapeutic. Imagine our kids working on arts and science projects for climate change instead of just being bombarded with only constant negative projections. They need to know the truth, but they also need to be given hope.

This is exactly an argument Kohei Saito makes in his book Degrowth - even if we know the odds are slim, do we not have a moral imperative to try while we still can?

Very late to the party but I’m still working through Anatham by Neal Stephenson. I think it’s solarpunk adjacent enough, in that it’s hopeful and has a lot of the sustainability ideas in practice - but also showcases a side where things have gone very wrong. I highly recommend it! 🍄