One day he’s criticized for saying that Hitler was a communist, the other for apparently assuming his love of nazis.
There’s an old series of books by Terry Goodkind that i’ve read as a child, named the Sword of Truth, each book has a wizard’s rule, and here’s the first one :
People are stupid. They believe things mainly because they either want them to be true or fear them to be true.
I’m not particularly fond of these books nor do i agree with this rule, but if you’re political then you’re judging real political actions, such as enacted laws, like adults do, or you’re eventually discussing assumed theories, but not unfair little excerpts regretted afterwards by the one who did them, and we can hopefully both agree that we should not explain our worldview or vote based on the latter, its ‘just for fun’/‘not serious’.
At least most journalists know that it’s only about influencing his future decisions, but you don’t if you believe it was ‘a coming out’/‘something to be discussed seriously’.
That’s just my two cents, thanks for reading my insults towards ~you, and let’s continue not changing.
feels like a dissimulation, not only of war crimes but also to prevent the identification of the victims’ status(, children, women, elderly, humanitarians, …), and a body count of the operation.
They wouldn’t have been found if Israel didn’t communicated the location.
So many bulldozers and yet many more lies, they’re even killing patients in hospitals, and have destroyed everything :
« Has not Moses given you the law ? Yet not one of you keeps the law. »
And « As they approached, Jesus said, “Here comes an honest man—a true son of Israel.” », but religion for them is a cultural thing, and they continue to consider themselves victims(, revelations/civilizations came afterwards and honored the legacy of an unworthy little land, yet they rejected it even though they should have disappeared&‘be forgotten’ if not for them). There’s no reason for antisemitism to exist if we’re all atheists yet they still believe that it’s around and that having jewish friends is now somehow compatible with antisemitism(, jews were anti-christians and anti-muslims as well, they just weren’t in power).
At least « two allegations of sexual violence in kibbutz Be’eri — widely reported in the media — were unfounded. », and https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/03/more-human-can-bear-israels-systematic-use-sexual-reproductive-and-other.
https://x.com/RamAbdu/status/1906344566308958466 and https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1902504823326703982
They deny any humanitarian help :
Abu Tawila among others :
See also Dr. Adnan Al-Bursh
More than 100.000 israeli subscribers :
https://archive.ph/iF1rz
https://x.com/AssalRad/status/1903138235309506716
https://x.com/KhalilJeries/status/1903835805686133149
https://x.com/caitoz/status/1904289208912789968
etc., that’s only part of what followed the end of the “ceasefire”, a unilateral massacre of “guilty” civilians from planes like we(sterners) are used to.
Accusations are nice but solutions are better, there’s no way that pro-palestinians countries will allow Palestine to disappear, and they’re too powerful&numerous to be ignored, so Israel may bring down its deserved downfall for refusing to share “their” lands.
If the current territory covered by Israel and Palestine was splitted into three between christians, jews, and muslims, then it’d be more easily accepted(, by the israelis,) if the shares were 33% jews, 16.5%+16.5% christians, and 16.5%+16.5% muslims, the five territories with Jerusalem as their capital(, perhaps with a slightly larger territory than currently). The goal of uniting one day in the future as a common territory with three governments may even be stated along with the redrawing of the borders(, and even end up with only one if the three religions of the Book ever fuse one day, Jerusalem/Israel/Palestine would be even more symbolic).
If Israel ends up with a territory of ~9.500km²(, sharing the rest with the two other religions of the Book), they should ideally also be offered a second country of less than 20.000km² somewhere in the world, accepting the location because of their shared ‘presence in’/‘ownership of’ the Sacred Lands. In that case, no need for the division 33 // 16.5+16.5 // 16.5+16.5, a simple 33//33//33 would do. And if it’s spitted 50//50 for jews//muslims, then a second territory of less than 15.000kms² would be enough.