Then what are you talking about? I didn’t downvote your post, but probably like people who did, I have trouble understanding your point. Everyone online - privileged and underprivileged alike - is under omnipresent surveillance of countless actors. Until very recently this was completely unregulated. Information about our behavior, interests, opinions, relations, health, anxieties and dumb shit we post in moments of confusion, is gathered, sold, recombined and resold. The rich and powerful are doing it in hope of gaining ability to predict and change our behavior - i.e. gain more power over us. So just because you are more privileged then some, you should not care? Or not appreciate that something good, even if small and insufficient, happened about this awful situation?
Tad Lispy
- 3 Posts
- 10 Comments
It’s not about advertising. It’s about spying on our online lives. Not the same thing.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Breaking Free From Social Media Silos With The FediverseEnglish
1·1 year agoSure. It’s in our nature to surround ourselves with like-minded people. Back in the old days, people would subscribe to a newspaper, watch TV and listen to radio stations, or go to pubs with folks they felt comfortable with, and that would often lead to gruopthink. There is only so much we can do about it with different platforms. The rest is up to us, individually and collectively. Being polite, open minded, thoughtful and critical takes effort. But it’s also in our nature.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeOPto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Breaking Free From Social Media Silos With The FediverseEnglish
3·1 year agoWhat you wrote is probably true, but it’s not the end of the story. Ownership model of corporate social media creates incentives to polarize and divide people. It drives engagement and creates moats. Also, billionaire owners of those media have their own political goals, and are happy to use the platforms they own to advance them.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeto
science@lemmy.world•Why incels take the “Blackpill”—and why we should careEnglish
1·1 year agoFuck incels! Not literally, of course.
Why not? It would cure them 😉
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Internet forums are disappearing because now everything is Reddit and Discord. And that's worrying.English
2·2 years agoTechnically? Not very much, but I’m handy with NixOS. The hardest part was the configuration of a mail server. I should probably blog about the setup process. But of course the real work is attracting people and keeping them engaged.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Internet forums are disappearing because now everything is Reddit and Discord. And that's worrying.English
19·2 years agoRecently I’ve created a private forum and so far I’m very happy with it. It’s nice that our discussions are private, keeping data gobblers, programmatic advertisers, grifters and other schmucks like this out in the cold.
To be clear, I’m advertising the idea, not membership.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•How to Avoid US-Based Digital Services—and Why You Might Want ToEnglish
211·2 years agoIs this coming from Wired magazine, aka the press organ of silicon valley? Big wows.
Tad Lispy@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•Nearly half of U.S. adults believe LLMs are smarter than they are.English
181·2 years agoIf we are talking about American adults, I guess they might be right.


Advertising predates tracking by millennia. We can have online advertising without tracking, and certainly without this orgy of sharing data between 4353 partners. But market alone won’t get us there, because whoever offers advertising without tracking and selling data will be at a huge disadvantage compared to the crooks who sell. Only regulatory action can help. So this small step should be celebrated.