
Removed by mod
You’ve heard of no true Scotsman, well that’s compared to me, the only true Scotsman. Everything I am is all things that are forever and not, therefore the fallacy isn’t.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Sure, as long as you no longer need credit that works out. Also since we’re talking the US, that’s as long as you don’t need a job, to rent, to drive, or do anything else that requires a credit check.
Not really, there are time limits where they can’t sue you anymore, and credit agencies will stop reporting the original debt holder, but you’re on the hook for life, usually even if you pay it off if it passes more than one collector.
Socialism does not mean controlled by the state, that is just a state service, which can be capitalist.
Socialism, and I cannot stress this enough, is not when the government does stuff
The US doesn’t have any socialist policies.
Yeah but the rest of the time it’s green. And it’s not like you couldn’t plant some evergreens along side to give some winter colors.
Not really, as someone that lives in an urban area with far more trees than this its pretty easily managed by leaf vacuum trucks. You just lead blow and rake them into a line on the side of the road and the truck comes by with a vacuum on the back to collect them for composting. Do this for like a month max and it’s fine.
Or the companies to do it anyway, and the president gives police protection to prevent any court officers from enacting any judgement against the company.
Removed by mod
Oh no, you’ve never read theory or anything even marginally related to economics from anything but a corporatist perspective.
I’m so sorry.
Anyway this discussion is above you. China is a socialist state. They are a dictatorship of the proletariat, not of capital. Their economy is centrally planned. Their economy is 60% publicly owned. The part of the economy that is a private market has nothing to do with anything essential to life. No part of Marx nor Lenin’s work precludes a market economy. Not one single part.
Read your theory.
NATO has nothing to do with brics. Given you have no idea how Chinas economy works I guess I shouldn’t have expected you to know the difference between economic and military pacts.
Over half the world’s GDP and population are a part of brics btw.
The nordics have less than 40% of their economy in the private sector? Got literally any sources for that little one?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
What basic macroeconomics? The fact China’s economy is insulated from capital and isn’t reliant on imports anymore?
China isn’t a capitalist nation in anyway. They have a private market, which cannot effect the rest of the economy.
Removed by mod