With every sci-fi story that’s been written incorporated into its training data, an LLM chatbot roleplaying an ‘AI’ persona is going to mindlessly auto-complete the most likely next thing that happens right after humans hand over control of the important dangerous thing to AI and trust it to make life-and-death decisions. It doesn’t have to be actually intelligent to be dangerous, it just has to be more intelligent than the people who think it is intelligent- and in my opinion it’s already there.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
uen3@sh.itjust.worksto
Technology@lemmy.world•Elon Musk’s xAI used child porn to train Grok models, lawsuit saysEnglish
61·3 days agoI wish that were my reaction to this. Instead, it’s a “DUH. No shit.”
Don’t stay inside. Find the nearest place to where you live with a lot of trees and few people, and go there, and walk. It won’t cure it, but at least won’t make matters worse the way sitting being sad in your room will.
uen3@sh.itjust.worksto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What will it take for you to really be done with the internet?
1·6 days agoMiyake event
uen3@sh.itjust.worksto
Work Reform@lemmy.world•Capitalism is an unrealistic death cult.
112·7 days agoAckshuuully there’s no such thing as overpopulation or overconsumption or carrying capacity overshoot. Those are myths made up by ecofascists, a very real and very scary right-wing political movement. The obvious true solution is for the whole world to come together and agree to follow my preferred system of government (or absence thereof) and then there will be plenty of resources to go around for everybody and billions of humans can live sustainably ever after.
And if you say that’s unrealistic and won’t happen, it must be because you are a literal exterminist Nazi who hates life and wants to do eugenics by genociding everybody- especially the brown ones and the poor ones- even though you didn’t say that- but come on, we all know you were thinking it.
So be ashamed of yourself, you Nazi, and go away now so I can win this argument by default- before I’m forced to post the well supported counterargument which I totally have.
uen3@sh.itjust.worksto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you rather: date someone who you like but who doesn't initially like you back, or date someone who likes you whom you don't initially like back?
8·8 days agoWell, the purpose of a first date is to find out if you both “initially like” each other, right? If so, there will be a second date; if not- not. So this sounds like a first-and-last date scenario, either way.
That means it’s an easy choice. I have to go with #1- no awkward burden of trying to get rid of her in a diplomatic way. No one is losing any sleep over why that weird boring guy they dated one time and didn’t like, never called back .
In reality though- dating isn’t a thing I do or would start doing. So not really qualified to advise on it.
uen3@sh.itjust.worksto
World News@lemmy.world•Mark Zuckerberg buys 440-acre Strancally castle estate in IrelandEnglish
7·11 days agoFetchez la vache!
I imagine when you’re knitting socks by hand- (or with whatever medieval sock loom may have been available?) it’s going to take you almost as long to just make a plain white one. But after the first about two of those you get really bored. Even more so if you were making a full floor size rug. So maybe the motivation for the ‘unnecessary design’ on everything back then was less about the customer’s vanity than the artisan’s sanity.




Protease?