• SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m comparing very similar countries in terms of culture, economics, geographical region, climate, education and technology, which are in the same market and have freedom of movement towards each other, except during the lockdowns.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sounds good, but they compared america to america and found zero benefit to the lockdowns. Literally we knew this in spring of 2020.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        What America needed to do was lock down interstate travel but we didn’t do that. We had no real quarantine, and people only broadly respected the mask mandate for a few months.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because we have rights and if mini-lockdowns dont work, I dont think crazy lockdowns would be justified. Why should I a healthy person not be able to do anything because other people might get sick? Why dont they stay in their house and let the other 90% of the population keep working?

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Half-measures are often far less than half-as-effective. Mini-lockdown didn’t work because it wasn’t a real quarantine, isolation was not achieved. Did you know the word quarantine comes from Latin meaning forty days? Because that’s how long ships were kept out of Venice in the late 1300s to make sure nobody on board had the plague. That’s the kind of harsh policy required for success, but the world decided that the immediate economy is worth more than permanent eradication of dangerous pathogens.