• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    lol and people think Andrew “no chin” Tate is alpha. He is not even an epsilon next to this guy (or next to a person randomly drawn from the population for that matter)

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I moved away from VLC because of the somewhat boring UI. Then I used potplayer, then I discovered MPV - which is awesome because it’s so performant you can easily customize it.

    But I think VLC helped pioneer the library that allows decoding and playing videos without the mess that were video codec drivers on desktop.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I try to play 3 random videos in VLC, they all three will play perfectly. If I try those same three on anything else, at least one of them will be buggy in some way.

      Yes you can argue there could be encoding problems in the video file of that buggy one, but somehow VLC just always works. Shit’s unbelievably good, so I won’t be switching.

      • DrMango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I remember the first time I encountered the Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) media type which ultimately lead me to downloading VLC as it was the only player that could handle it at the time

        • PopShark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Same story. I even remember where the files came from - ripped from Daft Punk’s Homework album (I had and have the physical CD)

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I used to use media player classic. it seemed good until I used VLC which was already way ahead of it

  • Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Looking forward to VLC 4. It (the beta) can handle playlists that are like 2000-4000 entries long in a second vs VLC3 which has a parser that is slow like molasses.

    it’s been 2-3 years and my usecase has changed, but it would be great to see this backported to vlc3.

  • Komatik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t understand why not take the money and make a new kind of vlc just a little different to comply

    • fin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      While VLC has a larger community and thus they want to put ads on it, the author rejects to do that. That’s the point of this post.

    • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re both free, you don’t have to choose and can have them both! Not everything needs to be compared and ranked.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gonna be real honest here, I would have taken that in a heartbeat. It’s an open source project, I could disappear with my money and the project could be continued from a different fork without ads. The only thing you’re really sacrificing is your reputation and with enough money I don’t care.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      and with enough money I don’t care.

      Most people are like you.

      Which is precisely why humanity will be just another of many dead end evolutionary cul-de-sacs in Earth’s natural history.

      I’ve come to peace with that, but this is a nice microcosm of the core reason. We can do better, we know better, but at the end of the day, almost all of us will just take the animalistic dopamine rush of winning.

      Live together or die alone. We choose the second one like breathing.

      If most humans were like Kempf (we’re not), we’d actually have a chance.