• jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    you (rhetorical you, not you) can recommend not using the AUR officially all you want. it doesn’t mean anything if a large number of tasks the average user is going to do require AUR packages. i’m kind of drunk rn but i’ll go find specific pages of the wiki that demonstrate what i’m talking about, i stg this isn’t nothing. the core system itself can entirely be managed with pacman, yes, but the average user is going to be doing a lot more than just that. there is a certain discord in the messaging of arch as a whole.

    this is exactly my point. arch can either be a nuts and bolts distro or it can be made for normies. it can’t be both.

    • elo13@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      it doesn’t mean anything if a large number of tasks the average user is going to do require AUR packages

      You keep saying this but can you give any concrete examples? I don’t recall coming across anything like this.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To reiterate, I don’t think there is anything wrong with using the AUR. I think that using an AUR helper that ties updating AUR packages to your pacman -Syu is a trap that people keep falling into despite the warnings in the wiki.