schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 1 day agoBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down13cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkBugs Found in sudowww.linux-magazine.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.world
minus-squaree8d79@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·19 hours agoI would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of run0.
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up17·edit-21 day agoThe vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak. More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
minus-squareComexs@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 hours agoWould something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
minus-square0x0@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoI don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
So ‘sudo-rs’ guys were right?
I would rather go with a completely new approach like the one of
run0.The vulnerability in question would’ve still happened if written in rust, it was not a memory leak.
More an instance of feature creep, as the solution was to remove the functionality.
Would something like ‘doas’ have the same issue?
I don’t believe so and it has been suggested as an alternative.
Rusty Bois are never right!