When I tried it in the past, I kinda didn’t take it seriously because everything was confined to its instance, but now, there’s full-featured global search and proper federation everywhere? Wow, I thought I heard there were some technical obstacles making it very unlikely, but now it’s just there and works great! I asked ChatGPT and it says this feature was added 5 years ago! Really? I’m not sure how I didn’t notice this sooner. Was it really there for so long? With flairs showing original instance where video comes from and everything?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Not the same thing.

    google allows for the possibility that the user was able to think critically about sources that a search returned

    chapGPT is drunk uncle confidently stating a thing they heard third hand from Janet in accounting and then taking him at his word

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Google results are like:

      Is peertube compatible with the fediverse?

      ADVERT

      Introduction: A lot of people wonder if peertube works with other peertube instances…

      ADVERT

      What is peertube? Peertube was set up in 1989 by john Peer…

      Pop-up: do you like our publication? Give us your email address.

      ADVERT

      Why you might want to set up peertube: peertube is a decentralised way…

      ADVERT

      Please support us! From £30 a month you can help us to write more.

      Wat is the fediverse? The fediverse is a technology…

      ADVERT

      Articles you may also like:

      • How to install Microsoft Teams
      • How to rent servers from Amazon
      • How to enable all data collection on Google

      ADVERT

      So can peertube instances talk to each other?

      ADVERT

      the answer is yes.

      ADVERT

      In conclusion, peertube is very…

      Comments (169)

      John Smith wrote at 12:28 on Friday

      Peertube is actually developed by a transphobic communist who turned my daughter gay. Boycott!!!

      • hono4kami@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        13 hours ago

        At this point, ad blocker is pretty much mandatory for me, just like how antivirus software used to be a decade ago (probably more)

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          PLEASE DISABLE YOUR AD BLOCKER! We use the revenue from annoying you to feed our starving CEO!

    • _NetNomad@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      but at least your drunk uncle won’t boil the oceans in the process too

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        How dare you, my drunk uncle is completely capable of boiling the oceans! He was even boasting about it at our last family dinner!

      • Wildmimic@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        noone boils the ocean with using chatgpt

        one transatlantic flight produces the same amount of CO2 as 600000 ChatGPT requests; if you use Quen 2.5, you need to make nearly 2 mio. requests.

        To set this in relation, transport only for Bezos wedding in Venice equals about 54000000 ChatGPT requests.

        Using a LLM once in a while is negligible.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      People before ChatGPT thought critically of things on Google as much as they do ChatGPT today.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        People before facebook thought critically of what they saw on the news as much as they do facebook today.

        Sure, people didn’t think about things too much at any point in time and sources aren’t always perfectly reliable, but some sources are worse than others,

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Unfortunately now Google is ChatGPT. It provides its own shitty AI answers, and its search results have been corrupted by an ocean of slop.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I assumed it was bwing used the current common usage for using a web search, like how kleenex is used for any facial tittle, not literally Google the search engine.

        Speaking of literal, Google is putting Gemini results before search results, not using chatGPT.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      chapGPT is drunk uncle confidently stating a thing they heard third hand from Janet in accounting and then taking him at his word

      Also you: “why do people bother to mention when information comes from ChatGPT”

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Do you click on the links?

        If they are links from the search, isn’t that just the same thing as doing a regular search and verifying the results?

        What does this extra layer add other than an unreliable middleman who is extremely inefficient?

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          But don’t you see? It allows the corporations to insert their opinion into the answer and bias you before you click that link. That’s better right?

          • IllNess@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You are correct. AI can give an a completely different answer than its source and they can just blame it on AI. This is true but Google has sway the results given depending on the individual. Obama talks about this and how it contributes to the extreme divide of people of the US.

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It steals content from creators while being worse for the environment at the same time. Not the same thing, it is worse.

          I worked in education in computer science and basic usage in nearly every age group. When you realize how bad people are at using search engines, you can see why people think they accomplished something using AI. It’s like giving a child a calculator saying he can do math now.

          Creating search prompts itself is a skill. You wouldn’t think so until trying to teach some one logic through search prompts. It is hell, literally my hell. Some people just don’t get it like 0 percent.

          Differentiating what is a good source and what is a bad source is an even harder skill. People will believe what they want to believe. Google search adapts to the bias of individuals because it keeps people searching. This is why, even though it isn’t perfect, engines like duckduckgo are important.