Interesting history and analysis of SMTP’s history. How can we prevent fedi and other open protocols from suffering the same fates?

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    This isn’t about email or centralization, it’s a Bitcoin promo piece.

      • Kiernian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Aside from one (seemingly very out of place at the time) early mention that the author used Bitcoin, there was no hint of it being pro-bitcoin until the very, very end.

        I found it to be a very worthwhile article right up until that point and even slightly intriguing from an academic perspective after that point.

        I despise the endless blind parroting of the typical cryptobro refrains elsewhere on the Internet when crypto is brought up and I still liked the article, so I wouldn’t write it off just because one guy with a cryptohammer inevitably sees the very real SMTP problem as a cryptonail in the end. It’s natural when you have a “solution in search of a problem” situation like we do with crypto (and block chain, and for that matter SharePoint. People with knowledge of a thing often try to use it to solve problems it probably wasn’t meant for.)

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is an interesting history of email though, it’s only the final 10% that even mentions bitcoin.