Trump is no longer bending the rules – he is demolishing them, with consequences far beyond Caracas

  • orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Jfc how convenient to have a narrative that paints the US as a fundamentally pure society that is only violent when corrupted by foreign powers. The USA is an empire. It has always fucking done this, every president before this man has done this, none of it is surprising or exceptionally brutal for a fundamentally violent system.

    I bet a bunch of people who read this and thought it wasn’t pro-imperialist propaganda hadn’t even thought of indigenous American nations as sovereign nations that USAmericans have invaded and inflicted genocide against for centuries. This isn’t even the fourth time the US has inflicted its interests on a Latin American country through military action.

    The USA is evil.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      So, what’s the point here? Whatever the evils of the US in the past, this is nonetheless a dangerous and frightening escalation, smashing a fragile world order. This message of, “oh, this is nothing new, the US has always been evil” comes across as a resounding call to complacency, and is a rhetorical technique widely used by the fascists.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re mistaken in almost every sentence here and it sounds like you’re unlearning some things. The USA is and always has been a fundamentally violent, extractive, sexist, racist, genocidal entity. How something like that reads as complacency to you can only be explained by you.

        When I say Donald Trump is not exceptional, I am encouraging liberals who are new to criticising the US state to not resort to further pro-imperialist narratives that views state violence as caused by individual bad actors and not a system that cannot exist without blood.

        • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          I see that I am not mistaken, as you have just proved by lashing out based on clearly faulty assumptions about me. I am telling you how your words may appear to others. (At least one other reader took it that way.) If you don’t want feedback in order to reach an audience with your political goals, then I’ll say instead: Wow. Very edge. Much brave.

          • orioler25@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Jesus. I don’t know what you expected me to feel from that. You don’t seem like a serious person.

      • Carmakazi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        The people posting this want a West that is paralyzed by corruption, ineptitude, apathy, and guilt (demoralization), while China slowly takes the reigns as the world superpower for better or worse, probably worse. They are not interested in constructive thought or action from us because they are probably not Americans nor do they want a reformed US. They want you to be apathetic while you watch your home collapse around you, because we were evil anyway and we deserve it.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Apologetics for past US imperialism does not seem a productive strategy for criticizing present imperialist actions, nor preventing future imperialism.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          they are probably not Americans

          No, it’s worse. They’re Americans that think this is a football game, and who have chosen the edgier team. They shitpost about Deng and Marx, so that makes them honourary Chinese, right? /s

      • evenglow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        comes across as a resounding call to complacency, and is a rhetorical technique widely used by the fascists.

        Nope. It’s just another warning that people will hand wave aside and ask what’s the point here and shoot the messenger.

          • evenglow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Being a wound collector is selfish. Notice how you are talking about the messenger and not the warning?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lemmy likes to push a certain conspiratorial worldview about these things. That’s the point.

    • evenglow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      From the article,

      The international laws and norms Trump has barged through had already been loosened by previous US administrations. The operation most closely resembles the 1990 invasion of Panama and forced surrender of its strongman, by the first Bush administration.

      That was followed by the younger George Bush with the invasion of Iraq on false grounds, and his administration’s broad use of rendition of torture. Barack Obama failed to hold his predecessor’s administration to account and pursued his own legally questionable drone assassination campaign against suspected terrorists.

      These are arguably discrete acts of hypocrisy by earlier presidents, who claimed exceptions from international laws in the pursuit of US interests, but mostly embraced global norms in the knowledge that the “rules-based system” overwhelmingly favoured America.