• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Four out of the top nine counties are in NYC. Once again a common W for Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, and the Bronx (not you Staten Island, you suck)

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Staten Island doesn’t have the subway infrastructure that other boroughs have. The one line it does have does has relatively high usage. Maybe it’s wise to expand it?

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Im not saying Staten Island cant be good, there simply isn’t the political will to improve anything. If their government and people got the heads out of the sand they would notice that there is demand for more rail infrastructure. Kinda like how there’s significant amounts of unmet rail demand in Queens and Brooklyn (hopefully the IBX helps the issue)

        • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re saying it as if Staten Island is its own city. The truth is that they can’t control the resources to build new lines. That’s something that only the city and state can do, and neither are prioritizing it rn

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure but consider that the MTA could be investing money toward places that would more appreciate it, Queenslink and the IBX are well received and suffer from very little resistance from local politicians. The MTA has almost no reason to invest in a hostile area that until relatively recently was extremely anti public transportation (the MTA operates on a decade long timeframe at a time).

            • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I think people make the mistake that NIMBYs represent the population, when in reality they’re just a very vocal and obnoxious minority as is the case in most places. I feel like most people there would appreciate a direct line to either Brooklyn or Manhattan, ideally both. I don’t think the city is wrong per se in prioritizing the other boroughs as they have more people, but I still think that Staten Island shouldn’t be left out of the mix. It’s still a big part of the city.

              • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Tbh if they want MTA investment they’re going to need to have their public transit supports make some massive noise, because rn the MTA and the politicians see Nimbys. Also there are a few key issues with this that need to be kept in mind:

                • The Staten Island railway is sorta doing its own thing so integration would expensive
                • The Verrazzano Bridge is not suitable for rail in general
                • Making a new bridge would be incredibly expensive
                • Making a tunnel would be even more expensive
                • Making a tunnel directly to Manhattan would be absolutely expensive
                • The subway service that serves that part of Brooklyn seems a bit overextended already