• BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    $70 for a game is mad. Even if it was critically acclaimed and award winning who can afford that when most people struggle to live? Even $50 is a lot of money. Big game developers have lost the plot.

    • thetrekkersparky@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      AAA games are just too expensive and many are just not finished at release now. I’m not forking out top dollar for a half finished game. Outer Worlds 2 is still $89.99 CAD. That is absolutely insane in my opinion. I enjoyed the first one, but I also bought it on sale. Indy games nowadays are generally a better bang for your buck anyways and theyre only $30-40 regular price and they are also generally at a finished state or at the very least very honest about the state they are in.

      I’ll probably pick the game up in 2 years when its $20 on Steam or something.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean I play the games either way.

      So whether companies learn to make their games affordable for the vast majority of Americans who are cash strapped or not is irrelevant to me.

      I’m just wondering how long it takes these companies to realize how many others like me there are out there and that they could be making a lot more money if they just made prices reasonable.

      I actualy finally have a decent income and I still do what I do if the price isn’t fair, just out of spite.

    • Joanie Parker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      This will be the new normal for a couple years. Then when no one in the US can afford a $30 game. They’ll set the prices back for $60.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This for me too. It is too high a ticket price for a game I want to play but am not completely excited about. My hardware will possibly also struggle with this title, so that was too high of a barrier for me.

  • Shoshin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean… I’ll eventually play it, but when it’s on sale for like less than $20aud and all the bugs are fixed and the rest of the content is added.

    The current approach to releasing half complete games at high prices, and then just trickle updates, means gamers are incentivised to just wait a year or two after a games releases before giving it a go.

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tried it 🏴‍☠️, they seem to have gone for “It’s bigger than the first one!” and indeed it is. Big, empty spaces to run through with nothing happening. Uninstalled. 70€ saved.

    Stop making huge environments full of nothing.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Honestly, the first one was Ok, I’m kinda surprised there was a second one.

    Ok, not really surprised since every IP needs to be a franchise, but you know what I mean.

  • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ya know… if they had spent a single second on the story instead and maybe made a cohesive plot that followed anywhere close to the first instead of phoning in the bullshit they did…it might have been a bit more well received.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I read this review and absolutely agreed with it.

      Fallout works because they wrote a really compelling real world. Then, they sprinkled jokes.

      Outer Worlds went the other direction. They wrote jokes, and tried to build a world around that. The Borderlands comparison is accurate.

      And it’s not like the world lore sucks. Using Borderlands as an example: Tales from the Borderlands focused on a compelling story first.

      Which is kind of crazy because I don’t understand how they made the original Fallout 1&2 and New Vegas. Like, they created this style of storytelling.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Outer Worlds 2, Avowed, Mass Effect Andromeda, Dragon Age Veilguard - each one of these games were touted for their improved combat, at least improved movement. That’s not to say any are great, just that they’re not as clunky as previous games. They are not standout in that regard. So for Bioware and Obsidian, it is still the case that their draw is writing in a higher budget RPG than the startup indie scene. Pretty much where Owlcat is now getting to with Warhammer and the Expanse licensed games, that’s where Bioware and Obsidian were 20-25 years ago. Narrative games

    Bioware and Obsidian games aren’t so fun to play to appeal with mediocre writing. I think like an 80+% reduction of irony, snark, sarcasm, eye rolls, modern slang, knods to modern culture would do wonders for their games writing. Don’t have to get rid of all of it. Just have them be more fun finds in a dialog tree that make them memorable and each high quality while the rest of the narrative takes itself seriously. I’ll 5 great jokes over 100, “ehh I get it. I guess that’s funny.”

    • Devmapall@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I couldn’t get into veil guard. The combat was pretty good and it looks pretty. The characters were annoying and seemed… Type cast? All their dialogue seemed corny. Maybe they get better throughout the story but the story also didn’t grab me.

      I played all the others and the mass effect series multiple times. I even enjoyed Andromeda for what it was (though I quit at the final mission save for some reason).

      • commander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        My guess on Veilguard is that after the original creator left, now it was up to remaining writers to maintain passion in lore that they didn’t formulate. So Veilguard, it all gets watered down and anticlimactically rolled out and the focus ended up being relationship drama which still sucked.

        A Dragon Age game that wants to be Lifetime channel medieval teenage fantasy romance but the characters are all seasoned combat veteran adults so it’s very weird for them to behaving so childish and unprofessional or even blase about the world ending/faith shattering reveals in the story. They are weirdly archetypal high school students placed in the wrong story

        I played DA1-3 a bunch of times. Veilguard just sucks. ME1-3 I never liked like KOTOR 1and 2 but good enough. Andromeda, it’s not interesting. Dropped maybe halfway through. Good gunplay and movement but overly big uninteresting worlds. I don’t remember what any character wanted. At least Inquisition, the different areas were visually memorable

        • Devmapall@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Super late response but lifetime chanel medieval teen romance sums up my the feeling I got from the game. It perfectly resonated with me.

          I enjoy listening to audiobooks that are pretty much escapist power fantasy’s and they have more interesting worlds and characters than veil guard did.

  • EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m not surprised. I was going into the final stretch of Outer Worlds 1 and realized I just don’t care. It wasn’t a bad game but New Vegas it was not.

    It did make for a great Secret Level episode though.

    • trebor8201@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Right. An hour after maxing out my character I realized I wasn’t really having fun anymore, I was just trying to get it over with.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Outer worlds 1 was fine. It was goofy, had character, but no depth to it’s story. The gunplay was not good, not for me anyway. Can we not do bullet sponges and leveled lists? Can levels give you abilities instead of numbers? Honestly would have been a better game if it was an isometric RPG, which obsidian is good at making.

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not shocked. this seems like, at best, it might be a $10 steam pickup… Same as the first game

    • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I got the first Outer Worlds for free…on Epic.

      The sequel will probably also be given away for free at somepoint.

  • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Your extremely expensive try-hard sequel to a just OK game didn’t blow everyone away? Womp womp. Obsidian died when MS bought them.

  • TalkingFlower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    For some reason, I just felt the humour was trying too hard, plus the price tag made the overall package unappealing to me.

  • whitecollarcry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Saw it came out and thought for a second “I want to play that” but in reality there was nothing redeeming from the first to bring me back

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think it was good, but not memorable. It was… Fine. It was a fun romp, I don’t feel like I wasted it, but I don’t think there needs to be a huge franchise either.

        I’m all for fine games. Not everything needs to be red dead levels and they did that with outer worlds. That said, I was shocked when Microsoft wanted 80 bucks for it when the first one was clearly a 40 dollar game