For me it’s PeppermintOS.

I started my Linux adventure a few years ago, and haven’t owned a Windows PC since.

I currently use Arch on my main rig, and I wanted to install Linux on two old laptops that I found laying around in my house

I then remembered the first distro I ever used, which is PeppermintOS, and I was amazed at the latest updates they released.

They even have a mini ISO now to do a net-install with no bloat, with a Debian or Devuan base.

Sadly, I believe the founder passed away a few years ago, which is why I was really happy to see the continuation of this amazing project.

  • crash_stop@lemmy.ml
    1·
    2 years ago

    Gnuinos or Trisquel - Trisquel cos its clean and just works. Gnuinos cos its interesting, Devuan based and just fast.

  • aramus@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 years ago

    Whenever somebody recommends NixOS, I just want to spam the comments with Guix. I prefer configs I can understand, and I think lisp makes that easier. Other than syntax, the only thing I see is people complaining about the free-oftware-only. But the recently hyped distrobox solves that (together with the nonguix repo). Yet nobody recommends guix in all these “immutable” distro threads.

    In my opinion Guix is the best mix of:

    • Arch (rolling release),

    • NixOS (“immutable”, atomic updates , rollback, reproducible, declarative configs)

    • Gentoo (source code based, write your own package definitions for any source code you find),

    with some lispy syntax.

    • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
      1·
      2 years ago

      NixOS, and hopefully soon SnowflakeOS which makes it more approachable for more casual users.

      https://snowflakeos.org/

      Another user mentioned Guix, which I’d like to try soon to compare to NixOS.

      It’s hard to compete with how much there is in nixpkgs though… as much as I… a professional Haskell programmer… hate to acknowledge the realities of network effects.

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        0·
        2 years ago

        So, I have only ever known Windows, but am becoming more and more Linux curious. I see all these different distros you guys talk about and I have to ask, do all the distros run any of the available software or would I have to try to try to find one that will run what I’m interested in running? If so which distro will run the available music production software? I’m sick of microshaft. Help a brother out?

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          2 years ago

          Welcome to the Linux community!

          There’s a certain set of us Linux users who cling to the adage “for beginners, distro doesn’t matter much.” A lot of the differences between distros are things under the hood that you won’t notice or care about. The main two things that will change your experience are the DE and the package manager.

          DE = Desktop Environment. The GUI, what it looks and feels like. This is a matter of personal taste, you can find DEs that look and work more like Windows, more like MacOS, or neither. Try out a few, pick which one you want. I like Cinnamon because they tend to put things where someone who’s used to Windows, but doesn’t really like Windows, would look for things. Again your choice of DE is personal taste.

          Package manager = app store. Think about smart phones, a major deciding factor is which app store(s) it has access to. My Samsung Galaxy has both the Google Play and Samsung Galaxy stores. If you buy a Pixel, you don’t get the Samsung store. If you buy an iPhone, you’re stuck with Apple’s App Store. Go back to what? 2014 or so and buy a Fire Phone, you’re stuck with Amazon’s app store. Same thing with Linux distros.

          In practice, most mainstream distros will support practically all Linux software in some way. I run Linux Mint, Mint comes with APT and Flatpak, and between the two I can find all the software I want. (Asterisk: video games, for which I have Steam). Other distros will have technically different but functionally similar package managers; on Arch you’d use Pacman, on Fedora you’d use RPM. The Steam Deck uses only Flatpak for user apps.

          So go with a fairly mainstream distro that has Flatpak support either out of the box or easily installed and you’ll be okay.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtfEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      True.

      While a joke, it’s actually a very well put together distro.

  • intrepid@lemmy.ca
    1·
    2 years ago

    Void Linux for the arch and gentoo crowd. It’s a system that can be assembled more cohesively.

    Nix and Guix - the ideas they bring to the table are revolutionary. I prefer Guix due to its use of Scheme (guile). But Nix is more mature and has more packages.

  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 years ago

    Void, Slackware, Alpine, Gentoo, Devuan (although I’d like for them to remove even the slightest semblance of systemd), FreeBSD

  • visnudeva@lemmy.ml
    1·
    2 years ago

    All of them, thanks a lot for all the Devs hard work, I’ve tried and loved so many distros that I can’t choose any of them but lately I have been using cachyos which is a clean and fast arch based distro.

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    1·
    2 years ago

    Pop_os!

    Like why is ubuntu still the newbie friendly distro to recommend? I feel like pop_os is a no brainer, and yet i never see it mentioned 😂

    Edit: just look at this post, im the only mention 😂

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      1·
      2 years ago

      I tried it once, and it was hella impressive, but I didn’t stick with it, I don’t know why. It just seems a little too much for me.

      • Alex@feddit.ro
        0·
        2 years ago

        It kinda fucks up your FS (not in a data-loss way, but it gets really messy): it was showing 3.2TB… on a 509gb partition of a 1tb ssd. Heck, I only have 3TB in my whole PC

        • Digit@lemmy.wtfEnglish
          2·
          2 years ago

          Different tools handle that differently. Takes a little extra eye adjustment to tease out the information from df -h, for example.

          • Digit@lemmy.wtfEnglish
            1·
            2 months ago

            Reinstalled my OS (after losing my prior OS from lightning & powercut)… and it’s MX Linux! Hehe. … Hijacked with bedrock linux in seconds after first booting into it. Added a fetch of gentoo and void, and imported an old artix from my other computer (since artix fetch still currently broken).

            Bleh… XFCE. I gotta get back into a tiling window manager soon. ;D Lagging on doing that, since I’m doing stuff (like playing long video playlists, keeping an eye on IRC, and so on).

            With only a little configuration (like turning off the dyslexia worsening transparency on terminal background), MX Linux does not hurt.

  • Unmapped@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 years ago

    I was a Arch Linux fan for at least 5 years. Tried all the main ones except gentoo. Kept coming back to Arch. But now I’m one week into using NixOS. I don’t think I’m ever going back. It has completely blown my mind, and fixes every minor thing I didn’t like about arch. Mainly how package dependencies work. I’m sure there will be a downside somewhere, but so far the only issue I’ve had is just trying to learn how to config everything.

    TLDR: NixOS. I don’t know how I didn’t know about it till recently. Seems like it would be a lot more popular than it is.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtfEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Just curious, revisiting this old thread…

      I was a Arch Linux fan for at least 5 years. Tried all the main ones except gentoo.

      Have you tried VoidLinux?

      … And… Still on NixOS after 2 years?