A Valve artist has defended AI disclosures on storefronts like Steam, saying they only scare those with “low effort” products.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe because of all the brigading/harassment campaigns? If it weren’t for that I’d think this is totally fine, since it’s good for people to be able to know more about what they’re buying.

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Surely ai users know how frequently the technology is used in bad faith and for nefarious purposes

        I think having a problem with the backlash is not a valid reason to avoid disclosing ai use.

        They should be mature and self aware and have a problem with the people and developers obviously misusing the technology so much instead

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think using AI to help make a videogame is in any way nefarious or misuse, especially for smaller developers who wouldn’t have the resources to make the game they had in mind otherwise. They don’t deserve to get review bombed or have nasty messages left on all their social media by organized discord groups just because of that, and it’s understandable they’d be worried about it.

          • gustofwind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Plenty of smaller developers don’t use AI too and we can simply disagree on whether replacing people with ai just so you can make your video game is misuse.

            Like is that really even an excuse? I don’t think it’s ok to harass people but if you want to use ai it seems you should accept the social consequences of review bombing given many people do in fact validly see its use as harmful.

            Especially when other small developers don’t use it to make games

            • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well to be fair for quite a few people it’s either them and AI creates a game, or no AI and no game. Though if it were me, I’d use AI art, put it in early access and use the money on art commissions to eventually replace it. Then again, in this situation I wouldn’t be agaisnt an AI disclaimer.

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                There’s been so much art and so many game produced every year before ChatGPT became big. If not using AI meant that we’ll only get slightly more indie games each year instead several times more indie games each year, I think we’ll manage without.

                There’s already more art available than any human could consume in their lifetime. We don’t have to push out slop to keep people entertained

                • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  True, honestly I’m no game dev, but I’d assume it would be hard to get anything “custom” for free. A lot of people don’t wanna have to spend much on a game that might just not work out. To be fair in this sotuation you could also just use free assets and replace them later. I’m just not a fan of the lemmy “black and white” AI is evil approach.