Nintendo has sent four DMCA takedown notices to GitHub targeting two Nintendo Switch emulators, Yuzu and Citron Neo, along with mod chip firmware.

  • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’d assume some useless forks that weren’t renamed or active. Or redundant secondary mirrors.

    The active Switch 1 repos are all self hosted now:

    Ryujinx continuations:

    https://git.ryujinx.app/projects/Kenji-NX

    Still active.

    https://git.ryujinx.app/Ryubing

    Edit 2: Ryubing is maintenance mode, dormant.

    Yuzu continuations:

    https://git.eden-emu.dev/eden-emu/eden

    Edit: i think suyu fork is maybe dead.

    I’m surprised Nintendo isn’t going after all the Switch 2 slopulators or static recompiles yet. I don’t think they violate DMCA because they work differently, not decrypting anything or using keys, but it’s Microsoft in the USA.

    • Even if they use the console keys, that shouldn’t be violating anything. You need a legit key and you can dump your own from a legit console just like the games. But DMCA takedowns are notoriously easy to abuse and slow to rectify abuses of it, while Nintendo is one of the biggest abusers of the system, using it to remove things that don’t actually violate any copyrights.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately, the settlement with Yuzu set a dangerous precedent. The judge decided that since Yuzu requires the keys to play the games, then Yuzu is clearly “primarily designed to circumvent encryption to directly violate the DMCA” or whatever.

        So Switch 2 emulators not using keys at all in any part of the process maybe protects them from that angle. They require decrypted games, so only the decrypting/dumping tools might be susceptible to takedown in the same way.

        • klankin@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yuzu settled out of court didn’t they?

          Plus nintendo only swooped in after yuzu released an update optimising for an game not yet released - destroying any kind of clean room argument.

      • Carl@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The issue is the whole “circumventing encryption” thing, which is what led to the infamous win for Nintendo. The judge ruled that by using an official Switch’s encryption keys, the emulator was primarily designed to circumvent encryption and sided with Nintendo.

        I agree that it shouldn’t be violating anything. But clearly, Nintendo managed to convince that judge. And since courts look at precedent and case law when issuing rulings, any future rulings will likely go the same way unless a higher court overturns it.

        • zikzak025@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Technically the judge never ruled, but Yuzu settled the lawsuit, either because they didn’t feel confident about their odds of winning, or that Nintendo just had more resources to fight a protracted lawsuit and the Yuzu devs did not.

      • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I see Github takedowns in a similar light to Google YouTube strikes. There’s no humanity or any attempt at defending creators, just spineless or bot corporate actions. Usually bots.

        A fool uses Github for spicy code now. Like a 14 year old recompiling OOT with Claude from what I hear.