silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agoLos Angeles burns: What you need to know | This is terrible. This is climate change.www.theclimatebrink.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1125arrow-down13
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkLos Angeles burns: What you need to know | This is terrible. This is climate change.www.theclimatebrink.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squaretroed@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days ago(Links a relevant paper in Nature from 2024 - gets downvoted. “Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.”) for those that need it spelled out: if you downvote actual science relevant to the topic you are “anti-science”
minus-squareenbyecho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoIt’s not the paper that’s at issue from what I see. It’s your binary interpretation of it.
(Links a relevant paper in Nature from 2024 - gets downvoted. “Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.”)
for those that need it spelled out: if you downvote actual science relevant to the topic you are “anti-science”
It’s not the paper that’s at issue from what I see. It’s your binary interpretation of it.