I like self directed research, it’s mostly rust stuff, but has some really interesting topics mixed in.
What? I agree with function[T]
style generics, and would be willing to change the access syntax to something like container.[index]
, as the dot makes the difference quite clear.
Or do you mean the approach to implementing a container or the way the compiler has to transform it into the set operation/mutable access? I didn’t think that was such a problem, and I quite like the way it is done in rust, but that approach may be unavailable to many languages.
What’s a struct, but a tuple with some names?
What’s computation but state and a transition function between states?
What’s computation but a set of functions transformed by simple term rewriting?
Let people enjoy their syntax sugar.
It’s a bit of a change but certainly the right thing to do.
My only disagreement with the article is the get/set stuff. I still want to keep something like the old container[index]
syntax, maybe container.[index]
to indicate that it’s a form of access. As long as generics go after names, this would not cause ambiguity.
No, the mirror reflects to the view finder untill you press the shutter, then it moves thr mirror to expose the photo sensor and then back.
If it’s a moving mirror camera* and it’s used to take stills it’s probably fine, as the sensor is only exposed for a fraction of a second per image.
If you want to film with it or put it in a phone, where it’s exposed all the time, it would certainly not be enough.
* I have no clue what they are called in english
If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.
the reason the bombers were in the open is due to Russian compliance with the START treaty.
First, Russia suspended it’s participation in new START
Second, are you sure that’s a requirement of the treaty?
The only relevant article I could find is the following (emphasis mine):
Article X
Looks to me like plane hangars are allowed while the tires on planes that they actually used are illegal as they don’t protect against the weather and just exist to fool bad satellite images.
Making compostable, non-toxic electronics is hard, so we decided on a harder goal!
Look we already made a robot out of 30% edible parts (hint its not the electronics), if we linearly extrapolate we will have full edible robots in no time.
Also eating search and rescue robots? Because the one thing we need in disaster situations, is for the expensive equipment to be single use.
(LT(PL * 5,DO) ERROR('079','USER IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY POLITE','1'))
(GT(PL * 3,DO) ERROR('099','USER IS OVERLY POLITE','1'))
Finally, we know how polite to be.
It’s crossposted from there.
2 miles? I almost biked that far to my primary school.
If you need to transport stuff, just get bags, that fit on the side if your bike.
To my understanding, the original meaning of object oriented is more similar to what we call the actor model today.
In reference to the modern understanding of OO, js uses prototypal inheritance, which some consider closer to the original vision.
Goes to show, that technology can only get you so far, if your doctrine sucks.
Also, they downed one and damaged another, why did they cross of three?
mostly present in fairytales these days
It’s also the currency in the german language donald duck comics.
They qualify under the local homestead law.
But because that limits year over year increases (which I consider reasonable) and is reassessed after mayor upgrades (which they did) they now have a huge jump in taxes.
Having the weight of 10 cars on the footprint of one can be a problem, even if the ferry can normally transport 100.
You should look out for IFVs from an airborne unit.
Are you sure the ferry could take the tank?
I heard the mathematicians have a way to describe this profound relationship: Dolphins ⊂ Whales