You aren’t happy with your selection of free software and still have the audacity to call the people behind that names? You didn’t even read the article did you.

Be a “decent” person yourself and start your own browser. We’ll happily judge.

So that’s where Andrew Tate went to after his release.

"Sounds like neither of you watched the video. "

That’s. The. Point. I neither watch videos nor read articles that suggest having boiled down a more or less complex topic to ‘the real reason (singular)’. Maybe it’s bad wording, maybe it’s on purpose. I’ll never know.

If a video title or headline claims that there is one single reason for xyz then most of the time it’s clickbait.

as long as it’s not your salary that gets ad-blocked.

So you neither pay with money nor by watching ads for a very expensive to maintain service, but you won’t leave it be either.

I know I’m making myself Unpopular here, but what is it that you’re bringing to the table? Currently you cost YouTube money because streaming video is really expensive. You block out all the ads so every creator is cut off monetization too. This is not a publicly funded library (yet).

They compare platforms from time to time, mostly indirectly. Android gets a mention concerning OS version fragmentation.