Is this the whole Makefile? The default target is the first rule that appears in the file which in this case is the DESTINATION rule, so if you just type make then it should work. If make is telling you there’s no rule to make the target then you’re probably invoking something like make all and you don’t have an all target.

When I run it your Makefile with no target, I get this error:

$ make -f blamster.mk 
/bin/bash ./myscript.sh source/1234-56-78-some-file-name.md > destination/SOURCE  
/bin/sh: 1: cannot create destination/SOURCE: Directory nonexistent  
blamster.mk:5: recipe for target 'destination/SOURCE' failed  
make: *** [destination/SOURCE] Error 2  

The following fixed Makefile works for me:

SOURCE := $(wildcard source/*.md)  
DESTINATION := $(foreach f,${SOURCE},destination/$(shell echo $(notdir $(f)) | sed -E 's/^([0-9]{4})-([0-9]{2})-([0-9]{2})-(.*)\.md$$/\1\/\2\/\3\/\4.md/'))  

all: ${DESTINATION}  

$(DESTINATION): $(SOURCE)  
	mkdir -p $(dir $@)  
	/bin/bash ./myscript.sh $< > $@  

The things I had to change were: In the foreach you need to reference SOURCE as a variable ${SOURCE}. In your recipe you can just create the directory directly from the output filename instead of doing another regex. Lastly, to create all output files you also need to create a default target (eg. all) that depends on all of the output files.

Will your management of the instance be as low effort as your introductory post that you obviously didn’t write yourself?

I see your post from piefed.social, so federation is working here. Good job.

You mean you don’t want to play remakes of PS4 games?

I would love to watch a GDC talk about how the engine works.

I don’t know how you’ve got the wrong end of the stick this badly.

I said:

Housing should not be a for-profit enterprise

When you hear about not-for-profit organizations, do you think that nobody is getting compensated for their labour? Don’t answer, it’s a rhetorical question.

Paying workers goes under the “costs” column. Profit = revenue - costs, so profit can be zero while costs is nonzero.

If it’s hard to understand, consider another similar thought that I would also espouse:

Healthcare should not be a for-profit enterprise.

Do you think that under such a system, nurses and doctors would not be paid?

Nice strawman. Where did I say that labourers shouldn’t be paid for their labour?

Yeah but imagine what a clown he will look celebrating victory over not just a man with a bin on his head but also “Nick the Incredible Flying Brick,” “Woke Trump Carrzee,” “Howling Laud Hope,” “Baron Von Thunderclap,” and a candidate from “Everyone is God party.”

And it’s an election that Farage called for, not his detractors.

On top of which, if he wins then the investigation into him by the Parliamentary Standards Committee will resume, and if he is found to have committed misconduct then there possibly will be another by-election. One which the mainstream parties will no doubt send candidates to.

Housing should not be a for-profit enterprise.

Bonjour Jean Bernard!

mdr vous regardez l’éclipse solaire quoi?

This is a really fucking weird way to frame “Poles who emigrated are now on average returning back to their homeland.”

To say “the diaspora is shrinking” makes it sound like they’re being culturally erased somehow. No, they’re just going back home more frequently than Poles back home are emigrating.

Thanks. This is the latest archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20250328163113/https://www.osstorage.com/

End-to-Endless Digital Storage Solutions

Endless? lmao

The cloud is just somebody else’s computer.

Open Source Storage

Anyone heard of this company before? Their name is impossible to search for!

Chat, is Amazon’s AI cooked?

That was the most mid trailer I’ve seen for a game.

I know what the tool does, I read the webpage.

Code coverage tools are generally specifically about test coverage, not which code actually gets executed or is unreachable.

Code coverage tools are for whatever you want to use them for. Lots of people use them to measure test coverage, but you can also use them to measure code usage in production. There are a variety of different ways to instrument code of various different levels of invasiveness and performance impact. Even the Linux kernel has built in instrumentation for measuring code coverage (kcov).

I’ve been using Orion (Kagi’s browser) on iOS for a while because it has uBO built in. It’s a fine browser (everything is just re-skinned Safari after all) and the ad blocking works as you’d expect.

It also supports installing Firefox addons, but I’ve found that to be buggy.

Was it really useful? Code coverage tools have existed for forever. Does Swift not have any FLOSS coverage tools like gcov?