

i mean if these are goth boots i would consider it too
Contact me on matrix chat: @nikaaa:tchncs.de


i mean if these are goth boots i would consider it too




thanks, i needed that today :3


nah i’d say it’s still delulu. delulu carries the spirit of silliness, not of factual inaccuracy


so i was just walking to the nearest supermarket when the supermarket radio (they usually play music) calmly announced “for the next week, we expect a warm 35°C” … wtf


you posted this article twice. delete this one and keep the other one.
lol it’s cooked so good you can make a soup out of it ;-)


eh idk, i had difficulty finding exact numbers. apparently the napoleonic wars did have wide consequences but not so much because of the number of people that died in them but because they basically pushed very severely the modernization of all states in europe, which then caused a whole lot of things to happen rather quickly.


yeah that’s not what i meant. phylogenetic trees are constructed by considering the genetics of recent (living) species, not from fossils.


this doesn’t really have anything to do with “work”, therefore it’s questionable whether it belongs in the “work reform” community. anyways, it’s a good post, with a good point.
it’s quite clear that we need tax reforms. the current system works for no-one anymore, not even for the rich. the stock market is a bubble only waiting to burst, and everybody’s well aware of it. the economy, the way it is today, is absolutely not sustainable. people are getting poorer, due to not having jobs, or rather the jobs pay like shit (bullshit pay for bullshit jobs) because the jobs aren’t fundamentally important to the economy. there’s a declining labor market because there’s not so many new inventions compared to 1900 when stuff was new and hot. (consider that the electric grid was literally invented around 1900, there’s an interesting chapter of history there, current wars). that’s why the labor market is cooling down.
i advocate for spaceflight partially because it would create jobs. also waging wars would create jobs but deeply unpopular so nobody wants to do that. so jobs will still be lost, and can only be partially replaced. we need a universal basic income or sth similar to give people enough resources to live. we need to start writing policy proposals for that. i propose the following fields should be covered and provided for by state-run services somehow:


there are 3 sources of energy on the surface of earth:
so, the thing is that earth’s internal heat generates 0.03% of the energy on the surface of Earth (source) while i couldn’t find any numbers for the moon (so i guess it’s too low to mention). so basically everything comes from the sun.
and this is true for living beings. living beings can live off the sun’s energy (photosynthesis) or they don’t, in which case they’re utilizing Earth’s internal processes (volcanoes, …) as an energy source.
basically all life was dependent on energy from inside the Earth before photosynthesis was developed, which is severely restricted. this is why this is such a big breakthrough.


ehh, modern biology doesn’t construct evolutionary history from fossil records, but from genetic similarities.


i looked up the number of deaths during the napoleonic wars like yesterday


yeah it was outright visible that the documentary was especially well-done because a potential IPO


is already included, heating as energy (electricity and whatever fuel or gas you use to drive and heat) and internet access as IT (maybe should have called it IT and telecommunication services)


thanks for the nuanced response, i will take it to heart.


ok, thanks, i’ll keep it in mind


I think this may have just happened to you OP. That’s not a common way to see children.
i don’t see it that way, but a lot of people in the US seem to, at least from what i can see. see my other comment for explanation.


i’ll include:
all at the communal level, responsible to the citizens
yeah i remember how shocked i was recently when i told somebody “the farmers don’t grow food, the plants grow food”. and they responded with “yeah but that’s their fate. plants literally exist to be eaten” and i was like “what if you said that about people? some people literally exist to be enslaved?”
point is, we treat nature with no respect about how it feels. this goes for plants but also other animals. it’s quite weird if you think about it. anyways, this discussion is getting weird.