Archived

Emboldened by the Trump administration’s split with Europe, Russian President Vladimir Putin may be preparing to directly test the resolve of the postwar Western military alliance.

In an interview with German business daily Handelsblatt, the chairman of European aerospace and defense group Airbus warned the continent needs to arm itself now that it’s likely the United States will not honor its obligations under NATO’s Article 5 common defense clause.

“There are strong indications that Russia is preparing an attack on NATO’s eastern flank,” René Obermann told the newspaper on Monday, adding that Putin will not likely wait until Europe has enough time to build up its own sovereign capabilities for deterrence before striking.

[…]

Obermann argues the Russian dictator has placed his country’s economy on a wartime footing with a fiscally unsustainable 10% of gross domestic product diverted to its military, according to Obermann. That’s five times the NATO minimum target, and Putin also plans to mobilize 1.5 million soldiers—the world’s second largest standing army after China.

With so much already invested, ending his expansionist campaign and returning to peace risks the one thing Putin appears to fear most—political upheaval. That may be one reason why a joint military exercise is planned for this year in Russia’s neighboring client state of Belarus.

“That is reminiscent of the events leading up to the Ukraine invasion. Furthermore, the internal pressure [in Russia] to deliver new victories through military conquest likely will grow,” he said.

[…]

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Can they, finally, so we can get this human meat grinder shit show stopped? The moment NATO can stretch it’s legs this should be over in days/weeks, right?

      • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Sure do, you don’t? Why isn’t Russia advancing further if they are so powerful they could withstand a nato assault? With the amount of bodies spent per km2, they would need to throw another million bodies at the front line just to secure the provinces they are already claiming as theirs.

        Seeing their stocks dwindle on satellite imagery makes me think they are at the brink of complete meltdown even without a direct NATO response.

        What do you think it would look like if article 5 was triggered?

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I will answer your questions because I’m always very interested in discussing these things in a controversial manner but first, can I play your last question back to you just to understand where you’re coming from?

          How would this go down in your mind?

          • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Finland, Sweden, and Estonia will take over St. Petersburg while Russia is busy trying to take a Baltic region that has the support of the rest of Europe? Not to mention I think Poland won’t allow that shit to happen a THIRD time in about a century - they’ve been prepping for awhile now.

            I mean, it would turn into a three pronged war where the first prong has already been struggling to even keep territory let alone gain it. Most of the pro soldiers are gone and it’ll be conscripts dealing with professional armies with modern tech.

            • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              That won’t happen. I’m not a nuclear alarmist but the Russian military will 100% use tactical nukes before they allow a foreign military to capture one of their major cities.

              • Pringles@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I think this is a correct assessment. Beating Russia back from their invasions is one thing, going after one of their major cities however is a red line where I think they will actually deploy nukes.

              • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                And if Russia does so Germany and France might do the same.

                Hence why they haven’t picked any fights against NATO either.

                  • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Germany has american nukes stationed in germany. France has also declared that their nukes will cover nato, as well as british nukes.

              • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I agree but russian nukes have been historically poorly maintained and in a terrible condition. They had Ukranians maintain them who stopped for some reason in 2014. Surely some will work but in the same way they don’t have the navy they claimed they have, the army they claimed they have they sure as hell don’t have the nukes they claim they have.