gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前Seeking for fundinglemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up1512arrow-down110cross-posted to: comicstrips@lemmy.world
arrow-up1502arrow-down1external-linkSeeking for fundinglemmy.worldgandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 个月前message-square18linkfedilinkcross-posted to: comicstrips@lemmy.world
minus-squareladicius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60arrow-down2·10 个月前Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other. So essentially you don’t need it.
minus-squarecoherent_domain@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·10 个月前Only when addition have a inverse operation.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 个月前If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.
minus-squarekittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·10 个月前Knda like AI, nobody needs it
Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other.
So essentially you don’t need it.
Only when addition have a inverse operation.
If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.
Knda like AI, nobody needs it