• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yes, but that headline would get less clicks.

    The museum is mad that they left after that, but honestly I’d be pretty terrified going up to them and mentioning that I’d fallen into a priceless artifact and broken it. In theory, they didn’t put up glass, and as professionals knew that means there’s a risk accidents could happen. In practice, maybe they’re short on funds and whatever bureaucrat sees suing me as a way out.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      A chair frame covered in glued on glass rhinestones doesn’t really sound priceless. It looks like something you’d buy at TJ Maxx.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I mean, there is that too, lol. I just have better things to do than start a totally subjective art argument.

        Also to that point, they’ve already fixed it. Which might be why they didn’t worry about protecting it that much in the first place.