• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Changing someone’s mind in a public debate isn’t necessary to show everyone they’re a fool. That’s usually enough.

    Whether they ever get sick of being a fool is entirely up to them. If they’re wise & mature, they will & maybe even admit it. Some people never do & it’s mostly their problem at that point. Humans gonna human.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Winning a public debate is much more about rhetorical skills than being right. You can be very knowledgeable in a topic of your research, still lose because you can’t put it simple while your opponent has simple answers to complicated questions and a catch phrase and some slogans

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Winning a public debate

        Never claimed “winning” (in that sense) mattered, only that we can show facts don’t support a fool’s conclusion (ie, “show they’re a fool”). Whether others care to recognize that or let themselves get misled by invalid rhetoric is up to them: some have better discernment than others. Upholding facts (or logic & truth) so others can accept them when they’re ready (not to indulge their biases) is “winning” enough to me. Humans still gonna human.