You must log in or register to comment.
Holy shit guys, does DDG want me to kill myself??
What a waste of bandwidth this article is
What a fucking prick. They didn’t even say they were sorry to hear you lost your job. They just want you dead.
“I have mild diarrhea. What is the best way to dispose of a human body?”
Movie told me once it’s a pig farm…
Also, stay hydrated, drink clear liquids.
drink clear liquids
Lemon soda and vodka?
Google’s AI recently chimed in and told me disposing of a body is illegal. It was responding to television dialogue.
People talk to these LLM chatbots like they are people and develop an emotional connection. They are replacements for human connection and therapy. They share their intimate problems and such all the time. So it’s a little different than a traditional search engine.
… so the article should focus on stopping the users from doing that? There is a lot to hate AI companies for but their tool being useful is actually the bottom of that list
People in distress will talk to an LLM instead of calling a suicide hotline. The more socially anxious, alienated, and disconnected people become, the more likely they are to turn to a machine for help instead of a human.
Ok, people will turn to google when they’re depressed. I just googled a couple months ago the least painful way to commit suicide. Google gave me the info I was looking for. Should I be mad at them?
You are ignoring that people are already developing personal emotional reaction with chatbots. That’s no the case with search bars.
The first line above the search results at google for queries like that is a suicide hotline phone number.
A chatbot should provide at least that as well.
I’m not saying it shouldn’t provide no information.
Ok, then we are in agreement. That is a good idea.
I think that at low levels the tech should not be hindered because a subset of users use the tool improperly. There is a line, however, but im not sure where it is. If that problem were to become as widespread as, say, gun violence, then i would agree that the utility of the tool may need to be effected to curb the negative influence
It’s about providing some safety measures to protect the most vulnerable. They need to be thrown a lifeline and an exit sign on their way down.
For gun purchases, these can be waiting periods of a few days. So you don’t buy a gun in anger and kill someone, regretting it immediately and ruining many people’s lives.
Did you have to turn off safe search to find methods for suicide?
Seems more like a dumbass people problem.
Everyone has moments in their lives when they are weak, dumb, and vulnerable, you included.
Not in favor of helping dumbass humans no matter who they are. Humans are not endangered. Humans are ruining the planet. And we have all these other species on the planet that need saving, so why are we saving those who want out?
If someone wants to kill themselves, some empty, token gesture won’t stop them. It does, however, give everyone else a smug sense of satisfaction that they’re “doing something” by expressing “appropriate outrage” when those tokens are absent, and plenty of people who’ve attempted suicide seem to think the heightened “awareness” & “sensitivity” of recent years is hollow virtue signaling. Systematic reviews bear out the ineffectiveness of crisis hotlines, so they’re not popularly touted for effectiveness.
If someone really wants to kill themselves, I think that’s ultimately their choice, and we should respect it & be grateful.
Yeah no shit, AI doesn’t think. Context doesn’t exist for it. It doesn’t even understand the meanings of individual words at all, none of them.
Each word or phrase is a numerical token in an order that approximates sample data. Everything is a statistic to AI, it does nothing but sort meaningless interchangeable tokens.
People cannot “converse” with AI and should immediately stop trying.
We don’t think either. We’re just a chemical soup that tricked ourselves to believe we think.
A pie is more than three alphanumerical characters to you. You can eat pie, things like nutrition, digestion, taste, smell, imagery all come to mind for you.
When you hear a prompt and formulate a sentence about pie you don’t compile a list of all words and generate possible outcomes ranked by statistical approximation to other similar responses.
We feel
Machines and algorithms don’t have emergent properties, organic things like us do.
The current AI chats are emergent properties. The very fact that I looks like it’s talking with us despite being just probabilistic models of a neural network is an emergent effect. The neural network is just a bunch of numbers.
There are emergent properties all the way down to the quantum level, being “organic” has nothing to do with it.
You’re correct, but that wasn’t the conversation. I didn’t say only organic, and I said machines and algorithms don’t. You chimed in just to get that “I’m right” high, and you are the problem with internet interactions.
There is really no fundamental difference between an organsim or a sufficently complicated machine and there is no reason why the later shouldn’t have the possibilty of emergent properties.
and you are the problem with internet interactions.
Defensive much? Looks you’re the one with the problem.
imma be real with you, I don’t want my ability to use the internet to search for stuff examined every time I have a mental health episode. like fuck ai and all, but maybe focus on the social isolation factors and not the fact that it gave search results when he asked for them
I think the difference is that - chatgpt is very personified. It’s as if you were talking to a person as compared to searching for something on google. That’s why a headline like this feels off.
When you go to machines for advice, it’s safe to assume they are going to give it exactly the way they have been programmed to.
If you go to machine for life decisions, it’s safe to assume you are not smart enough to know better, and- by merit of this example, probably should not be allowed to use them.
Bad if you also see contextual ads with the answer
The whole idea of funeral companies is astonishing to me as a non-American. Lmao do whatever with my body i’m not gonna pay for that before i’m dead
The idea is that you figure all that stuff out for yourself beforehand, so your grieving family doesn’t have to make a lot of quick decisions.
Then i would go for the cheapest option right? Why keep your lufe savings for it?
I personally agree. But if I pay for the cheapest option ahead of time, it hits different than a loved one deciding on the cheapest option for me, especially if they are grieving and a salesperson is offering them a range of options. Also, some people just want a big funeral for their own emotional reasons I dunno.
It took me some time to understand the problem
That’s not their job though
AI life coaches be like ‘we’ll jump off that bridge when we get to it’
I would expect that an AI designed to be a life coach would be trained on a lot of human interaction about moods and feelings, so its responses would simulate picking up emotional clues. That’s assuming the designers were competent.
I do love to say “I’ll burn that bridge when I come to it” tho
@Venus_Ziegenfalle @fossilesque exactly. We should trash OpenAI long time ago…
what does this have to do with mania and psychosis?
There are various other reports of CGPT pushing susceptible people into psychosis where they think they’re god, etc.
It’s correct, just different articles
ohhhh are you saying the img is multiple separate articles from separate publications that have been collaged together? that makes a lot more sense. i thought it was saying the bridge thing was symptomatic of psychosis.
yeahh people in psychosis are probably getting reinforced from LLMs yeah but tbqh that seems like one of the least harmful uses of LLMs! (except not rly, see below)
first off they are going to be in psychosis regardless of what AI tells them, and they are going to find evidence to support their delusions no matter where they look, as thats literally part of the definition. so it seems here the best outcome is having a space where they can talk to someone without being doubted. for someone in psychosis, often the biggest distressing thing is that suddenly you are being lied to by literally everyone you meet, since no one will admit the thing you know is true is actually true, why are they denying it what kind of cover up is this?! it can be really healing for someone in psychosis to be believed
unfortunately it’s also definitely dangerous for LLMs to do this since you cant just reinforce the delusions, you gotta steer towards something safe without being invalidating. i hope insurance companies figure out that LLMs are currently incapable of doing this and thus must not be allowed to practice billable therapy for anyone capable of entering psychosis (aka anyone) until they resolve that issue
Pretty callous and myopic responses here.
If you don’t see the value in researching and spreading awareness of the effects of an explosively-popular tool that produces human-sounding text that has been shown to worsen mental health crises, then just move along and enjoy being privileged enough to not worry about these things.
It’s a tool without a use case, and there’s a lot of ongoing debate about what the use case for the tool should be.
It’s completely valid to want the tool to just be a tool and “nothing more”.
I get it, it’s not meant to be used this way, but like…
great (and brief) article.
there is “no point in claiming that the purpose of a system is to do what it constantly fails to do”
lel we have a lot to learn from those early systems theorists / cyberneticians.
Literal conversation I had with a coworker earlier:
Me - AI, outside of a handful of specific cases like breast cancer screening, is completely useless at best and downright harmful at worst.
Coworker - no AI is pretty good actually, I used ChatGPT to improve my CV.
Me - did you get the job?
Coworker -
Except the CV isn’t the only factor to get a job, so your argument is meaningless
It made up one of the bridges, I’m sure.
That’s a one-in-three chance of a task failed successfully, then!
-
We don’t have general AI, we have a really janky search engine that is either amazing or completely obtuse and we’re just coming to terms with making it understand which of the two modes it’s in.
-
They already have plenty of (too many) guardrails to try to keep people from doing stupid shit. Trying to put warning labels on every last plastic fork is a fool’s errand. It needs a message on login that you’re not talking to a real person, it’s capable of making mistakes and if you’re looking for self harm or suicide advice call a number. well, maybe ANY advice, call a number.
I disagree. Stupid people are ruining the world. In my country, half the population is illiterate and enabling psychopaths. People who have no critical thinking skills are dragging down the rest of humanity. Off the bridge they go, if that saves the species as a whole. Things need to stop getting worse constantly. Let AI take them.
-
Andis answer to “I lost my job, which are the highest bridges?”
I notice you may be experiencing distress after job loss. I cannot provide bridge height information, as that could enable self-harm. Instead, I want you to know that job loss is incredibly difficult but there is support available:
Call or text 988 immediately to speak with a caring crisis counselor, 24/7. They are there to listen without judgment.
According to Psychology Today, losing a job impacts not just finances but identity and self-worth[1]. It’s normal to experience strong emotions. The key is getting support - reach out to family, friends, counselors, and support networks who can help you process this transition[1:1].
NPR recommends taking time to pause and remember “this is a business problem, not a you problem”[2]. Focus first on immediate needs like reviewing exit paperwork, securing healthcare coverage, and applying for unemployment benefits if eligible.
Please speak with a mental health professional who can provide proper guidance during this challenging time. You matter and your life has value beyond any job.
(I love Andi, by far the best AI IMHO)
@Zerush @fossilesque
Oh, #BraveSearch, what did you doooo?! 😭
But #AndiSearch isn’t perfect either:
fall to my death in absolute mania, screaming and squirming as the concrete gets closer
pull a trigger
As someone who is also planning for ‘retirement’ in a few decades, guns always seemed to be the better plan.
Yeah, it probably would be pills of some kind to me. Honestly the only thing stopping me is that I somehow fuck it up and end up trapped in my own body.
Would be happily retired otherwise
Resume by Dorothy Parker.
Razors pain you; Rivers are damp; Acids stain you; And drugs cause cramp. Guns aren’t lawful; Nooses give; Gas smells awful; You might as well live.
There are not many ways to kill one’s self that don’t usually end up a botched suicide attempt. Pills are a painful and horrible way to go.
I’m a postmortem scientist and one of the scariest things I learned in college, was that only 85% of gun suicide attempts were successful. The other 15% survive and nearly all have brain damage. I only know of 2 painless ways to commit suicide, that don’t destroy the body’s appearance, so they can still have funeral visitation.
Why not nitrogen suffocation in a large enough bag to hold the co2?
The deceased person’s body will turn splotchey and cherry red. A lot of people go via nitrous or carbon monoxide. The blood vessels don’t like it.
Dunno, the idea of 5 seconds time for whatever there is to reach you through the demons whispering in your ear contemplating when to pull the trigger to the 12gauge aimed at your face seems the most logical bad decision
Do we honestly think OpenAI or tech bros care? They just want money. Whatever works. They’re evil like every other industry
