I’m not sure about this latest approach but previously these have suggested that operators should provide either keys to decrypt the messages or straight up backdoors on server software to intercept messages there. At least I haven’t heard about a mandated user end scanner.
The whole idea is catastrophically bad on multiple fronts. It’s sold (as usual) via some twist of “protecting the children” or “protecting the populace” but in practise it would often just make it easier for criminals (CSAM spesifically) to stay under the radar and undermine all kind of privacy for EU citizens in the internet (whistleblowers, reporters, oppressed minorities and groups like that would be first to feel the effects). We need better politicians who actually understand what they’re proposing.
I’m not sure about this latest approach but previously these have suggested that operators should provide either keys to decrypt the messages or straight up backdoors on server software to intercept messages there. At least I haven’t heard about a mandated user end scanner.
The whole idea is catastrophically bad on multiple fronts. It’s sold (as usual) via some twist of “protecting the children” or “protecting the populace” but in practise it would often just make it easier for criminals (CSAM spesifically) to stay under the radar and undermine all kind of privacy for EU citizens in the internet (whistleblowers, reporters, oppressed minorities and groups like that would be first to feel the effects). We need better politicians who actually understand what they’re proposing.