• Deme@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure. If Jeff Bezoz’s emissions include his ownership share of the emissions by the Amazon corporation (which is a major part of the world’s logistical system at this point), then no doubt, but getting rid of old Jeff wouldn’t eliminate those emissions. I rest my case that half of all fossil fuels in the world aren’t going directly into their jets and yachts.

    • solo@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would be interested in seeing the methodology behind that figure

      If you click on the relevant link above, you will find the report itself. You can even download the methodology note seperately.

      • Deme@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, sorry I really should’ve sat down and done that to begin with.

        Billionaires’ lifestyle emissions dwarf those of ordinary people, but the emissions from their investments are dramatically higher still —the average investment emissions of 50 of the world’s richest billionaires are around 340 times their emissions from private jets and superyachts combined.

        Well, there it is.

        Edit: If there were 8 billion Amazon corporations, we would’ve shot past Venus a long time ago. The 90 minute mark seems to correspond to this. Getting rid of fifty (number of billionaires examined in the study) superyachts and a hundred 24/7 flying private jets would be next to nothing compared to the emissions from wider economy which they control, but which wouldn’t go away when the guillotine does its thing.