• Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If he doesn’t want xitter to be subject to European laws, then stop making it available in Europe.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the internet, that’s like asking me to stop having my house be on the street if I didn’t want people knocking on my door.

      How about Europeans stop using it or block it from their end instead?

      • DigiDemiFiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, pornhub pulled access to their website from my state and others because of state laws. Surely it couldn’t be that hard for X

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not an out difficulty but the onus of responsibility.

          If someone next to you is eating lunch you don’t like, you don’t ask them to leave the room. You leave instead.

          • DigiDemiFiend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ok… but your analogy doesn’t make any sense in this context. X isn’t eating lunch next to the EU. They’re selling sandwiches over the internet in the EU. The EU sent a letter pointing out that his sandwiches in the past have contained shit and we now have laws in place regarding shit filled sandwiches, so do not sell sandwiches that contain shit within our borders or we will pursue legal action against you.

            Also, quit your bullshit. If the EU just blocked it outright there’d be a huge outcry about them censoring free speech.

            • Akasazh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Thanks for your effort, guy’s as thick as a brick, but you kept in there.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, X is selling lunches at its house. Europeans are walking in off the street and entering it.

              The Internet is not the physical domain of Europeans.

              If you don’t want Europeans going to the site, block it on your fucking end.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                5 months ago

                Twitter International Unlimited Company
                One Cumberland Place
                Fenian Street
                Dublin 2
                D02 AX07
                Ireland

                VAT ID IE9803175Q

                They’re sitting in Europe selling lunches. More specifically, ads. They’re also sitting in Europe preparing lunches, more specifically, they have servers here. If they don’t want to be beholden to EU law then they should stop doing both.

              • DigiDemiFiend@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                5 months ago

                I really don’t understand your point at all. The EU sent them a letter pointing out that they have new laws and will be enforcing them. It’s on X to follow those laws, not follow them and pay the consequences, or geofence their service.

                If Europeans want to go the site they will if its blocked or not, if it’s geofenced or not. VPNs exist. The point isn’t blocking X or preventing people from reaching it. It’s serving notice that they will be subject to the law

                And it’s not like there’s one big ISP run by the EU where they can flip a switch to block X. They’d have to force each ISP to do it.

                • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  21
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  My point is that the Internet is international, it’s not Europes play space to enforce its shit on everyone else in the world.

                  Euros fucked over the globe enforcing their shit on everyone for hundreds of years, and they still sit back today and demand everyone follows their rules despite not even being European.

                  If you don’t want your people to visit these sites, you fucking block them.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    FML, even this sub is now about US politics and “Trump bad”, “Musk bad”. Please, please, go somewhere else. Thanks.

    p.s. blocked that jeff dude, maybe that will help.