• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Someone already showed that the linked article was outdated nonsense almost the minute it was published.

    Where? Everything I’m reading says that most of the new state-level areas are inhabited and not “ghost cities.” Unless Ohio State is wrong.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.

        But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I’m guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is what you said which started this conversation:

          I was just reading about it. It’s another web encyclopedia trying to incorporate other encyclopedias to compete against Wikipedia’s biases.

          I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.

          I thought you cared about facts and truth?

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:

            Edit: I read through the [page](https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism) on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.

            but the references linked were credible.

            I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?

            Five studies, including two from Harvard researchers, have found a left-wing bias at Wikipedia:

            • A Harvard study found Wikipedia articles are more left-wing than Encyclopedia Britannica.
            • Another paper from the same Harvard researchers found left-wing editors are more active and partisan on the site.
            • 2018 analysis found top-cited news outlets on Wikipedia are mainly left-wing.
            • Another analysis using AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ found that pages on American politicians cite mostly left-wing news outlets.
            • American academics foundconservative editors are 6 times more likely to be sanctioned in Wikipedia policy enforcement. source
            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              When did I say Wikipedia didn’t have a bias? Please quote me.

              Again, if you care about the truth, you’ll show where I made that claim that you think you’re refuting.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Maybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  “Maybe” you misread what?

                  I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.

                  You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won’t even admit it was a lie.

                  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.

                    Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.