• Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nowhere does it mention the nationality of the tourists, but somehow we all immediately know…

  • dariusj18@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The video shows, it isn’t that they accidentally sat in a seat, but they were posing as if they were going to sit on it, but fell back into it.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s fairly clear that he meant to touch and put at least some weight on it on his 2nd attempt. He only stumbled after the chair gave way.

    • Ragnor@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      To me it appears that he didn’t sit on it at first, but then changed his mind and sat down. I’m convinced that what you saw as him falling onto it is because he sat on it and then the legs buckled. The buckling caused him to fall further back, because the legs were stronger when they were straight.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yes, but that headline would get less clicks.

      The museum is mad that they left after that, but honestly I’d be pretty terrified going up to them and mentioning that I’d fallen into a priceless artifact and broken it. In theory, they didn’t put up glass, and as professionals knew that means there’s a risk accidents could happen. In practice, maybe they’re short on funds and whatever bureaucrat sees suing me as a way out.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        A chair frame covered in glued on glass rhinestones doesn’t really sound priceless. It looks like something you’d buy at TJ Maxx.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I mean, there is that too, lol. I just have better things to do than start a totally subjective art argument.

          Also to that point, they’ve already fixed it. Which might be why they didn’t worry about protecting it that much in the first place.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In the Wyoming and Montana (Yellowstone) area we call these people “tourons” (tourist morons). Sitting on a priceless piece of art or petting a giant bison, it all comes from the same place. Profound stupidity driven by an unhinged sense of privilege.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But the artist said he could see a “positive side” to the incident. “It’s like a kind of performance. Ordinary people can do it too, not just artists.”

  • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “and off they go. Indifferent to what happened”

    Not sure about that. The guy was shitting bricks and they scurried off pretty fast.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My brother is one of the more intelligent and scientifically-minded people I know, but I’ll never forget the time we went to the Detroit Institute of Arts and he got yelled at for touching too many exhibits.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why would you cover Van Gogh‘s chair in crystals? I love art but I could do without some artworks.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It isn’t actually Van Gogh’s chair, that’s just the name of the piece. It’s described as having a delicate inner structure covered in crystals (probably a wire frame). It’s not a real chair, which is why it collapsed instantly – it wasn’t created to hold any weight.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Of course it isn‘t. It‘s based on his painting and completely misses the point. It‘s a really stupid piece in a tasteless gallery.