Aggregatet
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months ago

EU member states' leaked Digital Omnibus compromise proposal eliminates revised GDPR definition of 'personal data' | IAPP

iapp.org

external-link
message-square
14
link
fedilink
88
external-link

EU member states' leaked Digital Omnibus compromise proposal eliminates revised GDPR definition of 'personal data' | IAPP

iapp.org

CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
14
link
fedilink
IAPP Staff Writer Alex LaCasse reports on a leaked draft of the Council of the European Union's opinion on the Digital Omnibus, which eliminates the European Commission's proposal to revise the definition of "personal data" under the EU GDPR.
  • Babalugats@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s how they plan to collect our data after the massive pushback so far against chat control. They’re trying to break GDPR and at the moment they are just performing weak spot exploitation.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Have you read the article? They appear to be rolling back a previous weakening, so it is the exact opposite of breaking the GDPR.

      In November they tried to classify pseudoanonymised data as not being considered personal information, even if it still contained information by which someone could be identified. This was following a court ruling in September that pseudoanonymised data could be considered personal information in certain situations.

      This proposal would roll back that change from November

      • Babalugats@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Have you read the article? Why would they need to rollback to a previous ruling in the first place?

        I’ll leave that one with you and expect to hear the loud clang when the penny drops.

        • Hint: look up weak spot exploitation.
        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Babalugats@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The EU commission are being heavily lobbied by the big tech, as they already have the sway that they need in the US.

            https://corporateeurope.org/en/2026/01/new-analysis-exposes-deep-influence-big-tech-eu-commissions-roll-back-digital-rights

            https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/17/technology/europe-big-tech.html

            Whether or not that’s the main reason that there has been a change in the wind for many politicians about our privacy and data, or whether or not they have seen other monetary gains from it is unknown. But there are many, many articles covering the lobbying and the push against GDPR etc.

            • Vincent@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sorry I actually deleted my comment almost straight away after posting it because ironically, I found that actually, I had misread your comment, but apparently it still made its way to you.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What pushback against chat control? You mean all the comments on lemmy?

      • Babalugats@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lemmy barely scratches the surface. Most people don’t even know it exists.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What other push back was there? I didn’t see it mentioned anywhere in mainstream media. I didn’t hear about any protests. Why are they capitulating on chat control?

          • Babalugats@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The digital rights movement itself was enormous throughout the campaign, but these were all big players too.

            https://www.politico.eu/article/one-man-spam-campaign-ravages-eu-chat-control-bill-fight-chat-control/

            https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/11/05/new-danish-proposal-for-chat-control-three-fat-problems-remain

            https://patrick-breyer.de/

            https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/chat-control-the-list-of-countries-opposing-the-law-grows-but-support-remains-strong

            https://tuta.com/blog/chat-control-criticism

            https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/what-is-fight-chat-control-viral-campaign-takes-off-over-proposed-eu-laws-3238717/

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 677 users / day
  • 2.76K users / week
  • 6.03K users / month
  • 14.2K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 10.9K subscribers
  • 7.68K Posts
  • 58K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • federal reverse@feddit.org
  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • !Europe Mod Team@feddit.org
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org