• answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just make inside trading and taking corporate and foreign Pac bribes illegal for them.
    Currently these two rules alone are why they rig laws for corportations and big pharma and insurance and oil companies, weapon manufaturers, banks, israel… they work for everyone but the citizens… And that some fucking how is legal and practiced in the open by both Democrats and Conservatives alike

    • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is where the real money is, and this is the real source of corruption; their salary is not the problem. In fact, I think the salary should be high enough that normal people will still be interested in the difficult and ugly game of politics. I wouldn’t run for office for less money than I make at my job - I have bills to pay.

      I think they should be barred altogether from making stock trades while in office. Maybe their portfolios could go into a blind trusts (or index funds or something) so that they cannot make insider trades. Likewise for their partners and close family.

      Manipulating the stock market is the principal motivation behind Trump’s trade and foreign policy. The same can probably be said about many Democrat and Republican congresspeople. Allowing this obscenity is the single greatest weakness of the American political system.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have a solution. Come up with actual Qol metrics for the average American, check them every 3 months, if they go down a congressman is selected at random for execution.

        • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I like it, but there is a hitch. With climate change, mean QoL is going to fall for the rest of our lives. We can mitigate the suffering and redistribute resources to make things equitable, but the best we can realistically do is improve median QoL.

  • DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sounds good on paper, until you notice this means… only the wealthy would ever bother running for office.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m sure many low wage workers would jump at the chance to actually make a difference.

      Why do we think only people who have become career politicians should be politicians? They’re the last people who should do it.

      A room of 600 plumbers, nurses, and bin men would make far better decisions than them.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s the theory behind pensions for most public offices and the police. To remove the temptation for corruption in office… not that it works

  • devedeset@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If members of Congress earn the average or median wage, that will ensure that only the rich can actually hold that position. Very, very few non-rich people would take that risk.

    • nullroot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      And it will only encourage lobbying, insider trader, and every other corrupt money making bullshit they still do with what they earn.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    And no money from lobbyists, no insider trading and no ability to award contracts to private entities

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    My thoughts on that was they got paid the average pay for the state the live in. Down here in the south they would have to get food stamps.

  • roboflop@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Early retirement, absolutely.

    With regards to politicians wages, I think they should be commensurate with the responsibilities of the job. But they should have no other means of income during their term, and potentially for a period afterwards. There would need to be much more stringent auditing and enforcement to ensure this.

    Politicians engaging I’m outside employment seems crazy to me, and is clearly a route to corruption.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    And a wealth cap. If you have 20 million networth but want to give it all up save under 200k (current median networth) to be a public servant then by all means. They made Jimmy Carter give up his peanut farm, which was the right thing, we should do the same for politicians today.

  • GutterRat42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would be okay with their salary being 5 times the federal minimum wage. They want a raise? They must raise the minimum wage.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    It should be treated like jury duty. Every year a new politician in every single seat of government. It will be absolutely perfect! Nothing could go wrong.

  • FukOui@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I agree with an earlier retirement, but I’m conflicted about the regular wage part.

    If gov members work for a “regular” wage, then what would be their incentive in public service vs other jobs. Or what’s stopping them from working a regular wage and then side hustle as the billionaires’ lap dog (not that different now tbh). Good will?

    • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Good will seems to work for teachers and nurses. Problem is more money would likely come from other sources (bribes, lobbying, that sort of thing)

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        In that case, I suspect it’s just a law enforcement issue. By which I mean, what would happen to a nurse or a doctor who ignored triage and took personal bribes to ensure certain people receive help first, while leaving other people who need more urgent help to die? That’s what should be happening to politicians too IMO.

        • FukOui@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ah but who’s going to watch the watcher? Or whose gonna enforce that if you’re the top dog?

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Right, but if you get to write the laws about what happens in those cases, I bet those laws have no teeth or are unenforceable

      • FukOui@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah. Like why would I work for a shit paying but powerful job, unless I have some ulterior motives. Good Samaritans exist but they’re a dime a dozen.

        • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          What I’m saying is there are tonnea of people who work hard for low pay everyday (ex. teachers and nurses).

          Being in a position of power however would likely corrupt them (or maybe attract corrupt people)