• flops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Everyone using a heat pump also reduces gas demand which lowers the gas price.

    So basically a heat pump is not only good for yourself but also for everyone else, even if you don’t look at the climate.

    That will of course switch when there is such a small number of households using gas that the grid will be a lot more expensive for those. But by the time we are at that point we can probably afford to gift them some heat pumps too.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      reduces gas demand which lowers the gas price.

      if only gas prices followed supply demand economics we learned in Grade 8.

    • Melchior@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Grid costs are already something like 20%. So the lower gas prices, due to lower demand will be matched by higher grid costs. That is as long as the gas stays cheap and there are no other issues with the LNG supply or so.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    All it took was an orangutan to start a war for the conservatives and liberals to suddenly like heat pumps.

    • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s the reason why I love the current situation. Only elevated prices and unpredictable volatility can switch the world off of fossil fuels IMO, because there’s way too many powerful people profiting off of it for it to be a natural transition. The situation has so very clearly spiralled out of control that the orange cunt can’t contain it, naturally, him being borderline retarded, he won’t be able to get out of this mess on his own. And as long as the price is as high as it is, demand destruction will take care of fossil fuels. That’s why I’d like for it to stay that way, such that demand destruction will be maximised. Fuck fossil fuels, objectively superior technology has been available for a long time. It’s time to end this nonsense.

      • Melchior@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not just that, but Iran and Ukraine are also attacking fossil fuel infrastructure directly.

        The other part is that really low prices are also good, because they lower investments into fossil fuels and the bribing budget of the fossil fuel industry. There is a decent chance we get those again as well, when the wars end. The organge cunt seems to have allowed Venezuela to enter the market as well.

      • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I love the current situation

        Privileged. Think about the millions of Russians, Ukrainians, Iranians etc. dying for a pointless global conflict.

        And about the billions of tons of CO2 and forever chemicals released by warfare.

            • LovelyMover@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              as opposed to the Russians, didn’t realise you wanted me to list them all. As you hadn’t mentioned the orange pedo, I wasnt going to bother bringing him up, everything he does is from a command from his russian midget controller anyway, so really irans’ being attacked by russia so putler can get the decrepit shit baby to blame ukraine for the fucking diesel prices & use up his stocks of missiles do they cant go to defending Kyiv from the carpet bombing of their civilians.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Denmark has separately cut electricity taxes specifically for heat pump households

    That is an interesting take for countries that still have high electricity taxes due to generation using fossil fuels. The long-term effect of shifting use to electricity should offset the short-term increase in usage.

    • vandsjov@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The Danish “electric heating” tax system works in a very low level way. A normal household is set to use around 4000 kWh of power for non-heating operation. Anything above that is just not taxed. This is the same for any form of electric heating, not just heat pumps. Also, January 2025 the government turned tax for electricity to the lowest that EU allows, so no special treatment for using more than 4000 kWh - now everything is with low tax. This deal was set to run for two years, so we will see if the old taxes come back at New Year.

    • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In moderate climates it is more efficient to burn gas to produce electricity then use that to run a heat pump, than it is to burn gas directly.

      Gas power plants are about 35-60% efficient depending on whether they’re a cheap inefficient peaker or Rankine, or a pricey CCGT plant.

      Heat pumps have a COP of 2.5x to >5 depending on outdoor temperature and series.

      Good gas furnaces/boilers and the grid are both upwards of 90% efficient.

      So a 40% efficient gas plant driving a COP 3 heat pump produces 1.2x the heat that you get from burning the gas directly. That’s close to worst case and you can also run your grid on other fuels.