The Reverend Sue Parfitt, from Bristol, was detained for holding a placard that read: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.” She was among more than 27 people arrested on Saturday for acts of defiance against the proscription.

  • Tail11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If she were in the US, she would be pushed to the ground and beaten by a bunch of white guys in riot gear and masks.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As someone stated… The police are not your friend. They are not there to serve and protect your interests. They are there to serve and protect the interests of the state you live in.

    The other day my wife’s car stopped at a busy road. The police quickly arrived and asked if she had crashed on to my car. Like how can we take this unfortunate event and turn it into a profitable situation where they can impound the car…oh it’s just engine failure, well you’re blocking the road so I’ll call the most expensive possible tow truck. How can we make your day worse?

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Maybe change Germany to the country the post is related to after copy and pasting this, it’s not they’re the only one.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Genocide accomplices!

      Everyone involved with this “law” should be tried and hung in the Hague for aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Now I understand more closely Starmer’s subservience to America’s Donald Trump.

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just wondering, if I would hold up a sign with ‘go isreal, continue the amazing work you do!’, would that get me arrested? Surely i’d get beat up but i mean what would the lawmakers think of that? Would it be different if the sign would say ‘go isreal, murder those innocent families’ or ‘go isreal, your genocide rules!’ (am i allowed to call it a genocide if i’m not against it?)

    • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      make is sarcastic, the British way.

      go on the telly, then show them a mirror to themselves. talk how excited you are for how many humanitarian volunteers are being slaughtered, how clever is it to stave children so they can take their land…

    • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Or you you could just, you know… protest against Israel and pro Palestinians without explicitly showing your allegiance to terrorist organizations such as Hamas.

      • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There is only one context in which Palestine Action is “a terrorist organization such as Hamas” and that’s the depraved legislation that the idiots in Westminster passed. The bravery of the 83 year old priest this article is about lays bare the depravity and stupidity of this absolutely idiotic legislation. Your comment on the other hand, by using this idiotic comparison buys into this aberrant degeneracy. Why do you do that?

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why are you talking about Hamas in a thread about Palestine Action? The two groups are not related at all and use totally different tactics (Palestine Action is explicitly non-violent).

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        without explicitly showing your allegiance

        So you assume by default that there’s either an explicit or implicit support for Hamas by protesting against Israel?

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          9 hours ago

          without explicitly showing your allegiance

          So you assume that there’s either an explicit or implicit support for Hamas by protesting against Israel?

          Sorry for using difficult words. Make simple for you now:

          • protest against Israel: Ok
          • protest for Palestinians: Good
          • support Hamas: very bad

          Understood or brain still hurt?

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              8 hours ago

              terrorist organizations such as Hamas

              Can you get more bad faith?

              Just stop using Palestinians as as guise for your love of terrorism.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Yeah, they’re the ones arguing in bad faith 🙄

                “Stop arguing in bad faith” *proceeds to immediately make the most bad faith argument I have seen in this thread*

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                trying to stop delivering arms to a terrorist group commiting genocide: terrorism

                commiting genocide and deliberately killing, maiming, starving and playing cruel games with the lives of civilians and literal children: not terrorism

                talk about bad faith… fuck off with all that.

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Thanks for providing a textbook example of bad faith arguing.

                  My point was that you can protest for the cause of Palestinians without showing allegiance to terrorist organizations.

                  You are not only claiming that you must support organizations that are defined as terrorist, you pretend I was the one defining their status.

                  Well done. (slow clap)

          • bthest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            OK but where is the explicit support for Hamas that this woman was allegedly demonstrating. “Hamas” doesn’t appear in the article.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              8 hours ago

              How explain word “like” simple? Difficult but I try - for you.

              • Orange like grapefruit - both fruit
              • Toyota like Ford - both car
              • Hamas like “Palestine Action” - both terrorist

              If still difficult:

              • grapefruit more sour than orange - still both fruit
              • Toyota better than Ford - both still car
              • Hamas way way worse than “Palestine Action” - still both terrorist
              • AlexLost@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                ICE is a terrorist organization. MAGA is a terrorist organization. You must be really against both of those things, eh? They use fear tactics and scaremongering, and when that doesn’t work, they get violent real quick. And they are based on both political and religious ideology to boot!

              • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Oh, I see, you think that just because the UK labeled Palestine Action a terrorist group, they actually are?

                Hey, come on over, I got a bridge to sell you!

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        the IOF is a terrorist organization. much bigger, more prolific and active than Hamas as well. literally a war criminal organization. funny how you never hear people getting arrested for supporting the IOF though.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Are there any pro “IOF” demonstrations anywhere?

          Holding up a sign in support of a terrorist organization will (hopefully) get you arrested.

          You might argue that “Palestine Action” should not be defined as a terrorist organization.

          You can hold up a sign supporting them to protest the designation. You will be arrested however. That’s just what happens.

          Personally I’m not so sure that Palestinians will benefit from all that.

        • fantasty@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          To simply imagine Palestine without settlers, to simply imagine a sky without drones—that, in the Zionist imagination, is genocidal. If you stick with the “want” of the charge, the notion that Palestinians want to kill all Jews, you find that Zionism is at war with our future. It is at war with our ability to articulate, even if only through poems and protest chants, a future in which Zionism does not reign. For in the past 100 years, Zionism has situated us in a condition of constant dispossession and premature death; our Nakba remains and renews. We are besieged in an inescapable, eternal present tense.

          Mohammed El-Kurd

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What really happened here: Members of this Palestine Action group sneaked onto a military base and attacked the aircrafts there. This act of politically motivated vandalism resulted in this group being officially banned by the government. Which is totally ok, no state in the world will and can tolerate some group doing acts of terrorism and/or doing sabotage.

      Supporting banned terrorist organizations is of course also not allowed (which really makes sense) and yeah, this priest totally did that on purpose. You are therefore totally fine holding up a sign supporting Israel and you are also totally fine holding up a sign supporting Palestine, but you are not fine holding up signs supporting banned organizations.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You’re equating vandalism to terrorism, you might want to look up the meaning of those words.

        • brot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The British House of Commons voted by 385 votes to 26 to add Palestine Action to the list of terrorist groups proscribed under the Terrorism Act. Maybe you want to tell us why your definition of terrorism is different from the one in the British parliament?

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Because they are unfairly biased in favor of Israel. The U.S. has shown its bias by denying the war crimes that every serious scholar has agreed is happening. The state of Israel itself has tried to shoehorn “criticism of the state of Israel” into the definition of antisemitism.

            Governments will stretch and distort definitions to suit their purposes.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Because i’m not a hypocrite, unlike the british parliament.

          • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That vote just shows us the British House of Commons is full of racists. Nothing new there.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Nah, Labeling them as “terrorists” is disproportionate.

        Criminals, yes. Terrorists, no.

        The definition of terrorism under british law can apply to basically any protest group and if applied retroactively would drag things like the suffragette movement under the umbrella of terrorism.

        This move is an assault on all of our freedom of speech

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Attacked aircraft? By smacking the landing gear with her walker?

        • brot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Please inform yourself: People of the Palestine Action group have sneaked upon a british military airfield and sprayed paint into the jet engines of several RAF planes.

          • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So? Did the paint damage the planes? The RAF should give them an award for exposing the vulnerabilities in its security measures.

            • brot@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yes, putting paint into a jet engine damages a jet engine.

      • huppakee@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What really happened is already in the article, my questions are about how lawmakers would respond if you openly support the same side they are supporting. That is especially relevant as r i don’t expect regular folk to let me walk around showing the same kind of support for genocide. This has nothing to do with the Palestine Action group and what they did or didn’t do.

      • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Thanks for providing proper context.

        Before they decided to break into a British military base and sabotage planes their status might have been debatable.

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    MPs had voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to proscribe the direct action group, alongside the neo-Nazi Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement.

    Has anyone affiliated with the other two groups been arrested since this went into effect?

    • ewo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This is a good question, apparently they’d rather lock up 83 year old women than violent facists and warmongers

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Honestly, you have way more stuff going that need to apologize for.

          Maybe look up Palestine Action before commenting:

          In June 2025, the Home Office announced that it intended to designate the group as a proscribed terrorist organisation after the group broke into RAF Brize Norton, vandalising and damaging two Royal Air Force Airbus A330 MRTT refuelling planes by spraying paint into their engines.

          Source: Wikipedia

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 hours ago

            vandalising and damaging two Royal Air Force Airbus A330 MRTT refuelling planes by spraying paint into their engines.

            Funny, I wasn’t aware vandalism is a synonym to terrorism.