• hotdogcharmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly I find their use of “dogpile” very offensive. A pile of dogs?? How rude. Besides which, my sister is a complete and utter dog and I don’t believe the mod in question has any right to talk about her hemerrhoids that way.

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I did not ban you, call you out publically, or insult you in any way

      I decided to ban you

      lolwut.

      He didn’t call you out publically because ke was afraid of the rightfuk and expected backlash.

      Threats done in private have a larger chance of success, and they knew it.

      • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, RaoulDuke is a thin skinned pussy, coming here and whining that he got banned from somewhere he doesn’t want to be. Oh no! Who cares?

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      69
      ·
      6 days ago

      He is right, though. He politely asked you to avoid some language at his channel. Why would you downvote that comment?

      Downvotes for disagreements were part of the downfall of reddit.

      • papertowels@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He politely asked you to avoid some language at his channel.

        Let’s be clear - the mod asked that OP not downvote the mods comment asking another commenter to avoid using the word bro. OP never said bro.

        Confrontationally DMing someone for a downvote is wild.

        • wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          6 days ago

          Exactly… And then banned them for something they did on a different community. It’s crazy to have such little power and still abuse it.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’ve upset a prominent mod on Lemmy.world so much by simply having a differing opinion that they banned me from their sub instantly and permanently (with no ban reason given) and then must have vine and asked their other mod buddies to ban me from their communities that I’d literally never so much as even visited lol. Within probably 15 mins of the initial ban I was banned from 3 other communities permanently, and that mod wasn’t a mod on them.

            I messaged a few of the other mods on the main sub to let them know what he did, but didn’t hear so much as a peep from them.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          OP never said bro.

          Right, my mistake.

          OP is also free to downvote however he pleases.

          I just wanted OP to know that the way of his voting created ‘Reddit’. If he wants to avoid it then the voting must change. There are powertripping mods and admins on Lemmy but the fediverse makes sure that that is not the problem.

          • papertowels@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            There are powertripping mods and admins on Lemmy but the fediverse makes sure that that is not the problem.

            Let me get this straight, you’re saying that powertripping mods aren’t a problem, because you could technically have the same content on a other instance, but you think a single downvote is a problem?

            What’s the alternative here? You’re so against the downvote being used as a disagree button, so do you think OP should’ve just openly commented their disapproval? How do you think this would’ve ended vs a powertripping mod?

            If all choices you can make to show disapproval result in bans, is it your fault, the powertripping mods fault, or are you saying we should just shut up and take it?

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              do you think OP should’ve just openly commented their disapproval?

              Yes. I think that’s how everything can develop respectfully.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He politely asked you to avoid some language at his channel.

        “Refrain from the bro-speak.”

        I don’t see a question here, just an unsoftened, unexplained demand.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    296
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Admins should only be looking at who downvotes posts when there is some sort of history of vote-abuse happening. Somebody voicing their opinion with their votes is a perfectly valid use of the upvote/downvote system.

    PTB

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Exactly. You can’t spam upvites, because the problem with spam is that it buries and dilutes actual, useful, quality content. A user “spamming” upvoting or downvoting isn’t really actionable spam - his up/downvote isn’t drowning out the others.

      The problem is brigading - when multiple people start mass up/downvoting and water down other votes.

      Same goes for spaming votes with multiole accounts.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    DMing me about downvoting your posts is a good way to get me to downvote you upon simply seeing your username. And bans don’t stop people seeing and downvoting your posts. Just posting and commenting in your comms.

  • tuckerm@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Prying into who has downvoted you is just not a healthy habit to get into. If you run your own instance, it’s important to just never use that ability.

    IMO, this is the kind of DM that is best ignored. I think most of us don’t want these communities to work like that; don’t give it any oxygen.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Are you even a “progressive” if you’re not constantly actively looking for things to be offended/outraged about so you can try and censor someone who has a different opinion?

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          If by “constantly looking” you mean “surrounded by fucked up shit from a country that claims to be free and take care of its own, but literally the opposite” then yeah I suppose it does

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, it’s good to have to check for vote manipulation, but if you don’t suspect that you should just avoid looking.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    6 days ago

    Got the same message LOL, I was also one of the down voters.

    Had no idea mods can see voting stats.

    This mod is weird and creepy for the message alone, stalking down voters WTF? Obviously thin skinned and on a power trip.

    The freedom of anyone being able to start their own instance, then get a load of the ones that own their own servers… Some will be assholes on a power trip. It’s bound to happen.

    • Newsteinleo@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      People like this existed before reddit, back then you just say fuck that guy and go to a different forum.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Its interesting how people are dogpiling this person in the name of “freedom of speech”…because they don’t like what he said?

          There is nothing I care less about than the rules in some tiny forum I don’t plan on visiting. Brigading him because someone is in love with the term “bro” and can’t live without it is weirdo behavior.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Its interesting how people are dogpiling this person in the name of “freedom of speech”…because they don’t like what he said?

            To be clear, they don’t like that he’s threatening to ban people from somewhere over speech. That is, first of all, not mere speech - that’s an action they’re threatening to take.

            Second, it’s not some kind of gotcha or contradiction that some speech might be disapproved of in the defence of free speech. You might espouse the principle of peacefulness, yet no-one would suggest that responding violently in self-defence was in contradiction to that. Being in favour of free speech doesn’t mean being in favour of all speech; many and varying exceptions are made, for example for hate speech, threatening speech or indeed speech which has the effect of restricting or chilling the speech of others. And we’re not talking about a violent or legal response here but rather dogpiling - and while that does chill speech in general, it’s not on the same level so deservedly has a lower bar.

        • Jikiya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Friendly censorship of an inoffensive word. With the threat of being banned for flavor. SO friendly.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Isn’t the software architecture supposed to promote certain ways to interact? The medium is the message kind of thing?

  • sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This insanely nonsensical behavior is prevalent in tons of communities, and it should be shunned and avoided. These moderators are not worth a fraction of your time.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lemmy is decentralized and admins of any instance can see upvotes/downvotes and moderate their instance as they want, we are far from reddit where the ceo of the company can decide to censor the whole platform.

    I would like to highlight another problem that makes lemmy stink as much as reddit: why are you posting this in the asklemmy sub? Popular content on global frontpage is shit and a bunch of sub are hijacking all the traffic, had you posted this in another sub there would be 5 comments at best.