The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 seconds ago

    On the right, three House Republicans recently introduced a bill that would prohibit the federal government from purchasing automated surveillance systems that use facial recognition, biometric IDs, or license plate recognition, “including a Flock Safety camera.”

    Really? Wow. Okay, when you lose Republicans (well, some Republicans), you KNOW you’ve gone too far. Damn.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    Okay, here’s the compromise: you close everything down, and we don’t feed you to a hungry business of ferrets.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Fuck these clowns. Their “compromise” is finding some way to quiet the bad press while continuing to do what they’ve been doing.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Remember that town Winona where all eight of their Flock cameras were cut down?

      CNN has an interview with a town councilman who says “we’ll just wait until all the news dies down and everyone will forget about all this”

      Our elected officials all think we should live in a big PRISON

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Okay, here’s the compromise: disband your company and we’ll put away the guillotines.

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      “Us” is the pedophiles running things, and “keeping us safe” means attacking their critics.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      So the compromise is they get cameras, and we get to hunt them for sport.

      We’ve just not been holding up our end of things.

  • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How about we compromise by saying remove them all, give back the money spent, delete all data and in exchange you don’t get the treatments due one helping enable orwillian levels of suvelance

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Interesting that he’s framing it as a balance between privacy and safety instead of privacy and security.

    Flock cameras haven’t been proven to make anyone safer.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Yeah what even is the argument for that? Even if a crime is caught on one of these things they’re still not making anyone safer. The crime still happened and that’s the best case scenario where the crime is caught on tape. From what I’ve seen usually these things provide circumstantial evidence at best.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If anything they actively make people unsafe by falsely flagging drivers with a partial tag match for a stolen vehicle

      • BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Don’t forget all the stalking by many various people abusing the database and live feeds